Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Bsp. Williamson: "Belief in N.O. Eucharistic Miracles Necessary for Holy Oils"  (Read 27557 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

+Williamson responds:


Dear Sean,

It is clear and repeated denial of true scientific evidence which renders anyone guilty of one of the unforgivable sins against the Holy Ghost. Let anybody in doubt look them up.

Common sense says that precious gifts of God should hardly be handed out to people hardly able to appreciate reality.


God bless, BpW.
I have a feeling that the same people who attack "dogmatic sedevacantists" will defend Bp. Williamson's new dogma and his anathema of all sedevacantists and others who believe God wouldn't approve the Bogus Ordo by miracles.

I wonder if belief in Garabandal and whatever the other false apparitions Williamson promotes are also required for salvation.

I have a feeling that the same people who attack "dogmatic sedevacantists" will defend Bp. Williamson's new dogma and his anathema of all sedevacantists and others who believe God wouldn't approve the Bogus Ordo by miracles.

I wonder if belief in Garabandal and whatever the other false apparitions Williamson promotes are also required for salvation.

Of course you do.


I have a feeling that the same people who attack "dogmatic sedevacantists" will defend Bp. Williamson's new dogma and his anathema of all sedevacantists and others who believe God wouldn't approve the Bogus Ordo by miracles.

I wonder if belief in Garabandal and whatever the other false apparitions Williamson promotes are also required for salvation.
I'd also like to add that it is related in Our Lady of Fatima by W. T. Walsh that most of the priests initially rejected the apparitions. Were they sinning against the Holy Ghost? Who'd dare say such a thing?

Bp. Williamson's statement is so outrageous I believe he might change his mind.

Does he even realize how many souls he declared lost?


Offline gladius_veritatis

  • Supporter
"The Chewbacca Defense is a legal strategy in which a criminal defense lawyer tries to confuse the jury rather than refute the case of the prosecutor. It is an intentional distraction or obfuscation.2 The defense dates back to the 1998 episode of South Park, "Chef Aid," where a parody of legendary lawyer Johnnie Cochran defends his clients by talking about how Chewbacca, an 8-foot-tall Wookie, "lives on the planet Endor." It is a way of "winning" a debate through methods other than logic and reasoned argument."

While humorous and entertaining, one could argue that +Williamson, not those who oppose his stance, is Cochran in this matter.

Denying unsettled -- i.e., disputed -- "scientific evidence" is a sin against the Holy Ghost?  Sounds eerily similar to the nonsense that was just shoved down the world's throat in connection to Cooties-19.  So be it.  Godspeed to all.