CathInfo.com

Make up your mind. Choose.

Either you write in public, to all those people that you normally write to, that you have been wrong to deny the possibility of Eucharistic miracles at Novus Ordo Masses, and you quote several cases of such miracles which you now admit to have taken place. And you will have to persuade me that you sincerely mean what you write, and that you are not writing it just to deceive me. Judging by your past behavior that will be very difficult for you to do. And I have to remain the judge as to whether you may or may not have done it. And if you try any form of weaseling out of it, I will never again read an email of yours. Choose.

Or you find yourself a bishop who agrees with you. How about Bishop Pfeiffer?

In Christ,

Bp. Williamson

I find this demand to be rather strange:
It does seem to indicate that Bishop Williamson would give him the Holy Oils if he were to publicly agree not only in the "possibility" that NO Eucharistic miracles have taken place but to cite "several case" where he admits that they HAD taken place.  I have to say this is bizarre, to make this a condition for receiving Holy Oils.  Who doesn't know that belief in miracles and private revelations is not obligatory?  If Bishop Williamson had other, deeper, problems with Father Hewko, that would be one thing ... but to fixate on something this trivial?

Consider that both Fr. Hewko and Bp. Williamson were subjected to occult curses from a Santeria Warlock.

1. Fr. Hewko was exposed to Cuban voodoo for 7 years.

2. Bp. Williamson surely suffered an attack when he stayed at the Pfeiffer farm in 2013.
    (HE starts condoning the Novus ordo missae in the late Fall of 2015).
   
3. Even Bp. Tissier was exposed to a Santeria malefice, when Pablo crashed his Chicago priory living quarters around 2015.

Make no mistake. 
Infiltration of traditional Catholic venues and Santeria curses are the only thing that makes the demonically inspired, Mexican warlock tick.