CathInfo.com

It seems to me that if the good bishop sincerely believes these miraculous fruits come from the Novus Ordo Missae, he should reconcile with the church who authored it. If the NO missae comes from the Church and is thus valid, good and holy (in some cases?), what was the purpose of defending the Tridentine Mass all of these years?

I will gladly attack any eccentrics who believe in any dogmas proclaimed after 1950.

Judging from Bp. Williamson's response posted by Sean Johnson, the good bishop has apparently become much more eccentric than usual lately.

I have a huge respect for him, but somethings simply cannot be accepted.

Bogus Marian apparitions, Valtorta, attendance at the Novus Ordo Mass, and now, the "reality" of a "miracle".

Actually, he said the sin against the Holy Ghost is the "repeated denial of true scientific evidence" and not the "acceptance of NO 'Eucharistic miracles.' " The qualifying condition is that the evidence must be both "scientific" and "true." If the evidence is speculative, falsified, or even disputed, then the condition the bishop states regarding the sinfulness of the denial will not apply.