It seems to me that if the good bishop sincerely believes these miraculous fruits come from the Novus Ordo Missae, he should reconcile with the church who authored it. If the NO missae comes from the Church and is thus valid, good and holy (in some cases?), what was the purpose of defending the Tridentine Mass all of these years?
That's a good question.
But I don't think that the conciliar church would be the author of any supposed eucharistic miracle that might take place in it. God would be the author of that, if it were really true. If we believe that the Catholic Church is occupied by a Modernist sect (as a few of us on this forum do) rather than the visible Church in Rome being completely extinct, then it might follow that the Modernist sect that occupies the Church draws its life from the True Church that is being occupied. Bp. Tissier de Mallerias once likened this to a parasite which feeds off of a host. The parasite cannot live, except for what it draws from the lifeblood of its victim; in this case, the victim being the Catholic Church. The Church is still alive, but occupied. Maybe that's what +W is getting at? He doesn't want a schismatic mentality to prevail, perhaps? I don't really know. I do hope that he offers some clarification at some point.
Topic: Bsp. Williamson: "Belief in N.O. Eucharistic Miracles Necessary for Holy Oils" (Read 27913 times)