CathInfo.com

This is top notch!!! R&Rers you better start listening to this man.

I honestly believe he's considering it.  He's dropped some hints, just like I mentioned before he came out regarding the legitimacy of Bergoglio that I felt he was considering it.  He's referred somewhat derisively (in his speech about the Vitium Consensus) to those who believe the problem is just Bergoglio as "Montinians", i.e. those who think Montini through Ratzinger were just fine, and that the problem began with Bergoglio.  Or perhaps it was in his presentation at the Ann Barnhardt conference.  I don't quite remember where he started using the term, but it was meant as his rejection of the core Bennyvacantist principle that implied Bergoglio was the only problem.  He's repeatedly stated that Bergoglio is merely the inevitable metastasis of the Conciliar cancer.  That's why I think the charges of +Vigano being "slippery" are completely false.  He showed up to Barnhardt's conference and largely shot down her position, just as he intended to show up at Michael Matt's conference knowing he would make waves.  Based on those two incidents, I don't believe he'll compromise what he believes for the comfort of his audience .  I just think he hasn't fully made up his mind in terms of coming up with an explanation for how this could have happened.  Perhaps he doesn't feel any sense of urgency to go there right now because, well, those men are dead and are no longer a factor.  In addition, I think he too (like Bergoglio for his nefarious motives) has adopted a tactic of gradually leading the conservative Novus Ordites who will follow back to Tradition.  With that in mind, he couldn't very well go post-Pius-XII SV immediately.  He's taking it one logical step at a time and trying to bring as many as will follow with him back to Tradition.  He didn't want to go from 0 to 60 and then lose 90% of the people who might have otherwise listened to him and taken him seriously.