Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: BREAKING: Archbishop Viganò Summoned to Vatican Tribunal on Charge of Schism  (Read 28558 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Quo vadis Domine

  • Supporter
So saith one of our sedevacantist overlords here. You have no jurisdiction over me. YOU do not get to tell me what to believe or what I must do.

You are absolutely correct! A layman has no authority to tell you what to believe, BUT THE POPE DOES!

For the third time: When we get a true pope, are you going to listen to him and obediently follow his teachings or will you continue to follow your own caprice, sifting through and questioning his teachings, as you do with your current “pope” Bergoglio?

Offline Quo vadis Domine

  • Supporter
I think it's hopeless.  We've been promoting these "Fundamentals of Catholicism 101" here on CI for years and it simply "does not compute" to minds that have been corrupted by R&R.  Unfortunately, many here have been reduced to little more than thinly-veiled Old Catholics.  In order to salvage their "security-blanket" of having some guy walking around Rome in a white cassock whose picture they can put in the vestibule, they're willing to throw the entire Catholic Papacy and the entire Catholic Church (with her marks/notes) under the proverbial bus.  It's a very sad state of affairs.

R&R may be the first and most grave error that a legitimate Traditional pope will have to condemn and correct before all others.

Sadly, I believe you are absolutely right.


Offline Meg

You are absolutely correct! I have no authority to tell you what to believe, BUT THE POPE DOES!

For the third time: When we get a true pope, are you going to listen to him and obediently follow his teachings or will you continue to follow your own caprice, sifting through and questioning his teachings, as you do with your current “pope” Bergoglio?

I'm not going to address a hypothetical that has for its end some arbitrary time in the future. Why not deal with the here and now?

You do not get to dictate to anyone what the Truths of the Catholic Faith are. Evidently, you believe yourself to be as a priest (as some of the other sedevacantists here do), which entitles you to force others to the tenets of your sedevacantist religion. I do not belong to your sedevacantist religion. I do not believe that the laity are on the same level as the priesthood, as you (and Bergolio) seem to believe.


Offline Quo vadis Domine

  • Supporter
I'm not going to address a hypothetical that has for its end some arbitrary time in the future. Why not deal with the here and now?

You do not get to dictate to anyone what the Truths of the Catholic Faith are. Evidently, you believe yourself to be as a priest (as some of the other sedevacantists here do), which entitles you to force others to the tenets of your sedevacantist religion. I do not belong to your sedevacantist religion. I do not believe that the laity are on the same level as the priesthood, as you (and Bergolio) seem to believe.

There are two hyperbolic sayings (questions) which demonstrate the problem with your position. 1) Are you more Catholic than the pope? 2) Is the pope Catholic?

Both of these “questions” have the same connotation as saying: “is grass green?” and “is water wet?”

A person who holds the sedevacantist position can still avail himself to the use of those two rhetorical questions.

Your bizarre notion about Catholicism turns those questions on their head because you truly believe that you are, in fact, more Catholic than the pope. An honest person will see the inherent problem with this.


Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
You are absolutely correct! A layman has no authority to tell you what to believe, BUT THE POPE DOES!

For the third time: When we get a true pope, are you going to listen to him and obediently follow his teachings or will you continue to follow your own caprice, sifting through and questioning his teachings, as you do with your current “pope” Bergoglio?
Bravo!