CathInfo.com

I recall reading that in the rite of consecration of Bishops, it states the purpose of the Episcopate quite clearly:

“A bishop judges, interprets, consecrates, ordains, offers, baptizes and confirms.”

“Grant to him, O Lord, an Episcopal chair for ruling Thy Church and the people committed to him. Be his authority, be his power, be his strength.”

I simply do not understand this concept of the Novus Ordo possessing the true authority. They don't have the Faith. Maybe I am misunderstanding or taking what others say too literally.

“But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be anathema.”
— Galatians 1:8, DRB

Furthermore, the sacred and holy Synod teaches, that, in the ordination of bishops, priests, and of the other orders, neither the consent, nor vocation, nor authority, whether of the people, or of any civil power or magistrate whatsoever, is required in such wise as that, without this, the ordination is invalid: yea rather doth It decree, that all those who, being only called and instituted by the people, or by the civil power and magistrate, ascend to the exercise of these ministrations, and those who of their own rashness assume them to themselves, are not ministers of the church, but are to be looked upon as thieves and robbers, who have not entered by the door. — Council of Trent, Session 23, Chapter 4

Isn't this "door", the Faith?

I am not trying to provoke anyone, I am honestly wondering about these things. Isn't it the Faith that is the source of true authority in the Church (not rhetorical questions)? By authority, I mean the authority to dispense the sacraments, and the authority to teach and govern the faithful.

I recall reading that in the rite of consecration of Bishops, it states the purpose of the Episcopate quite clearly:

“A bishop judges, interprets, consecrates, ordains, offers, baptizes and confirms.”

“Grant to him, O Lord, an Episcopal chair for ruling Thy Church and the people committed to him. Be his authority, be his power, be his strength.”

I simply do not understand this concept of the Novus Ordo possessing the true authority. They don't have the Faith. Maybe I am misunderstanding or taking what others say too literally.

“But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be anathema.”
— Galatians 1:8, DRB

Furthermore, the sacred and holy Synod teaches, that, in the ordination of bishops, priests, and of the other orders, neither the consent, nor vocation, nor authority, whether of the people, or of any civil power or magistrate whatsoever, is required in such wise as that, without this, the ordination is invalid: yea rather doth It decree, that all those who, being only called and instituted by the people, or by the civil power and magistrate, ascend to the exercise of these ministrations, and those who of their own rashness assume them to themselves, are not ministers of the church, but are to be looked upon as thieves and robbers, who have not entered by the door. — Council of Trent, Session 23, Chapter 4

Isn't this "door", the Faith?

I am not trying to provoke anyone, I am honestly wondering about these things. Isn't it the Faith that is the source of true authority in the Church (not rhetorical questions)? By authority, I mean the authority to dispense the sacraments, and the authority to teach and govern the faithful.