Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Branding of the SSPX,  (Read 4730 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Branding of the SSPX,
« Reply #5 on: June 14, 2013, 02:57:50 PM »
Thank God there is a resistance. It almost makes we wish that Fellay would come to a deal with Rome, because any deal would not be acceptable to many of the SSPX priests, so more priests would leave the SSPX and join the resistance.

Branding of the SSPX,
« Reply #6 on: June 14, 2013, 03:11:20 PM »
Quote from: Matto
Thank God there is a resistance. It almost makes we wish that Fellay would come to a deal with Rome, because any deal would not be acceptable to many of the SSPX priests, so more priests would leave the SSPX and join the resistance.


At this stage there is the resistance and the neo SSPX. Many priests and laity remain with the neo SSPX until Bishop Fellay makes an agreement.

It is a matter for each conscience regarding remaining in a SSPX chapel. I can only speak for myself but will no longer attend SSPX chapels. Just as I never get a foot in both camps Novus Ordo and Tradition, I don't intend to remain with a priestly society, which has surrendered  the principles of the founder, appeased Jews in such a public manner, and betrayed Tradition. There remains the grave matter of the blasphemy against the Mother of God by Bishop Fellay and his use of the Holy Rosary in his deception.

To be honest I would have to question the integrity of those who remain in SSPX chapels. I will pray for them. Are these people happy with the silence of the priests and lies and deceit from priests?

If a Novus Ordo priest was to commit blasphemy against the Mother of God, there would be endless threads on Ignis Ardens or Cath Info yet here we have Bishop Fellay do it and some 'JoeSixPack' declare Bishop is not a liberal. What is he then?


Branding of the SSPX,
« Reply #7 on: June 14, 2013, 03:13:35 PM »
Probably not...

Branding of the SSPX,
« Reply #8 on: June 14, 2013, 03:18:51 PM »
Taking the argument and it is a fair argument priests are remaining silent for a reason. Have those who hold to this thesis a time frame in relation to when they expect or hope the cleric will actually speak out? Five months, Five Years.

I am open to this argument that Father is being 'prudent', 'keeping counsel'.

To be honest if one has remained silent until now, why bother be vocal now? As discussed at London momentum was lost in getting rid of Bishop Fellay but fair analysis, he would be replaced by another Menzingen mouthpiece.

Branding of the SSPX,
« Reply #9 on: June 14, 2013, 03:24:03 PM »
I felt sorry for the SSPX laity I met at funeral of Deirdre Manifold. They hadn't a clue. 37 priests in France, the German Carmel, the various letters.

As I said I felt sorry for them. The priests are to blame which goes back to the question of why the priests are silent and where they stand on an agreement.