That's a concern and it betrays a very superficial understanding of the crisis in the SSPX.
The resistance-minded Trads I know remain remarkably clear-sighted.
Don't you hear so many "Bravos" from the Resistance clergy about July 1? +Aquinas, +Z, +Morgan, Fr. Chazal... They all add a tiny caveat: 'Wait and see' they say. Well, what exactly are we waiting to recognize if the neo-SSPX has gone retro 2012? They lost the confession, marriage deals, probably all N.O. churches are closed to them. What exactly do we want the Neo-SSPX to declare in the next weeks? Their latest media blitz is : We are not in schism!!!
Someone asked me if I was going back to the SSPX. To explain my decision to avoid neo-SSPX, strong arguments are not obvious. . Is the book : "As we are?" obsolete? Is the SSPX still eager for dialogue?
The entire Trad movement just experienced a cold shower...uncertain times is an understatement. On the flip side, this will expose all the arrangements SSPX had, "under the table" so to speak, but were discrete and secret.
Definitely not the same as 1988!