All that this thread lacks are photographs of Bishop Fellay celebrating a Black Mass and combing his hair carefully so as to hide the buds of the horns growing out of the top of his head.
Is it really too much to ask that you people base opposition and resistance to this guy on rational, moral, and theological grounds?
That's the most shallow, ridiculous post I've seen in a long time, and I've seen some pretty lame ones, like by poche and petwerp. But now it's time to move over, guys, because here comes claudel.
You sound like Michael Voris. No one is allowed to notice that man behind the curtain. Because we are supposed to be taken in by the wiles and snares of the Menzingen-denizens! The lions are on the prowl, and it's our place to be eaten alive! It's the will of God, in fact! ----------- NOT!
What this thread is, is rational, moral, factual ground. The post that B from A provided includes source links. Did you somehow forget to notice that, claudel?
Or, did you just not care to notice? Then you'd have to recognize something you don't want to think about, apparently.
As for "theological grounds," how about doctrinal, for starters, or do you not consider doctrine 'theological'
enough for you? So long as the subtle
bishop doesn't openly deny the divinity of Christ then he's just peachy keen in your book?