I found this video of Bishop Williamson's interview by Stephen Heiner done back in 2009:
I was rather surprised that Bishop Williamson knew about Bishop Fellay's comment about 95% of the Council being good much earlier back in 2009 before the recent CNS video of recent months and still had no qualms about it then. In this interview, Bishop Williamson even seems to show understanding about Bishop Fellay's intent when +Fellay made that statement. Question: What changed between 2009 and 2012?
Did Fr Couture ask you to post this? Any thoughts yourself on the Bishop being threatened with expulsion? Have you an opinion on the Menzingen lawyer, trento?
Do I need to ask Fr. Couture to post every single question on the thread? Do you guys ask Bishop Williamson or Fr. Chazal if it is alright to post their videos on the Internet too?
You want to know my thoughts on +Williamson's expulsion thread? I do not accept that +Williamson ought to be expelled on his views regarding 9/11, the number of Jєωs gasses in the chambers, etc, but I do think it is not proper for a Catholic bishop to put forth his theories in sermons. In fact, I think it only gives ammunition to +Williamson's enemies to nail him via other means such as the secular courts. You may not agree with me and I believe I will get a lot of thumbs down for this, but I'm telling it as I see it.
I've yet to see what +Williamson's expulsion threat is based on, but if it is due to insubordination, then it would be the same as what happened to Frs. Chazal and Joe Pfeiffer.
I'm more concerned with the split that happened in the SSPX, especially in Asia, Korea being the most sad example. The resistance folks are burning bridges with people who are not pro-agreement but have not publicly declared their position, calling them evil, thieves, and such. This, I believe, is counter-productive, and the doomed 'public' resistance will only be due to the very attitude of those folks themselves! Fr. Onoda is pro-agreement? Fr. Laisney is pro-agreement?