Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Pfeiffer Supporters?  (Read 6531 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Pfeiffer Supporters?
« Reply #35 on: August 16, 2021, 04:27:43 PM »



                            

    "Witness if you will, a rural, traditional Catholic priory with priests, seminarians and a warlock."



Re: Pfeiffer Supporters?
« Reply #36 on: August 16, 2021, 05:38:04 PM »

March ordinations



Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Re: Pfeiffer Supporters?
« Reply #37 on: August 31, 2021, 12:33:37 PM »
Someone wrote in to correct me that Bp. Williamson did "eat at Pfeifferville" but Pablo wasn't around. That tells me it was from the early days, before Pablo (and his dark master) completely took over.

So I have modified my text to be more accurate:


Quote
I heard that Bishop Williamson, at one point (probably towards the end), visited Boston, KY and refused to stay in the guest house and/or eat the food there. He refused to settle comfortably onto the conveyor belt and "stay in this room, here is your meal, etc.". I don't remember the exact details, but it sounded like he was taking certain precautions, like he had heard all about Pablo.

The thing is, the post wherein I heard this is probably still to be found on CathInfo. All the posts, all the history, is there for historians to feast upon.

Likewise, the phenomenon of Pablo himself. Pablo could have shown some shady tendencies before "all the good people" bailed on Fr. Pfeiffer. For the simple reason: They weren't always a package deal. Fr. Pfeiffer and/or Hewko came to our chapel a total of 3 times, but I never once met Pablo in person. So even if Pablo was misbehaving on the Internet and in KY, I could morally support Fr. Pfeiffer while not subjecting Catholics to Pablo. After all, Fr. Pfeiffer isn't literally married to Pablo! He was somewhat involved in Fr. P's apostolate, yes. But the extent of that involvement was not always so crystal-clear. So it's somewhat complicated -- at least for that short period from 2012 - Nov 2014. By then, the mask had been torn off, and Fr. P started attacking Fr. Zendejas and Bp. Williamson without cause, he released the infamous All Saints Day sermon "Put a rosary under your pillow rather than attend Mass", etc.

It gets even more interesting when you throw Fr. Voigt into the mix. The latter was saying Mass here once a month, WHILE I was in full-on war mode against Pfeifferville after Nov 2014. I was defending the Resistance priests and yes, attacking Fr. Pfeiffer/Pablo without pulling any punches. Fortunately, Fr. P seems to have had less than full control over the world, and Fr. Voigt in particular.

Just goes to show you what you can get away with -- hahaha. Evil doesn't always have as much full control as you think it does.

Re: Pfeiffer Supporters?
« Reply #38 on: August 31, 2021, 01:35:04 PM »
What has happened there doesn't affect valid ordinations. With the current crisis in the Church you really cant be choosy about priests in an emergency situation as long as they are valid. If he absolves me from my sins his personal issues don't affect my soul.
Pfeiffer may be a priest, but not a bishop. Anybody "ordained" by him is on thin ice. One of them, young Mr. Croissette is at OLHC in Garden Grove, CA. I read on Cath Info that he did two masses there: a private one on a Saturday and a public evening mass.

Re: Pfeiffer Supporters?
« Reply #39 on: October 01, 2021, 08:02:36 AM »
We know Croisette, "ordained" by "bp?" Pfeiffer, travels around saying "mass" at Pfeiffer supporters' homes.

But there is not a word about the other "ordained" by Pfeiffer, Daniel Cooke.  No outpost mass schedule, no masses at OLMC, nothing.  What's he up to?