I think, what is more, that Sean may have derailed his own new book.  I know I wouldn't think to buy it, despite the Intro by +W.

Howlingsworth-

That's an interesting comment, which highlights your own immaturity (even at your advanced age, which is most undignified), since this is what you wrote previously:

"Thank you, X, for continued additions to your Catalog of Compromise. I just added #41 to my file. You have to be a person of some erudition and scholarly training. You can not possibly be numbered among us average CI plebeians. Why? You use an economy of words, i.e. no throw-away remarks, which so often characterize CI posts; no nonsensical rants to which some forum members seem especially addicted. Your English grammar and syntax are impeccable. Your knowledge of the situation historically suggests that you were, (at one time anyway), deeply immersed in the affairs of SSPX, and/or that you probably had more than a passing acquaintance with ABL.  I follow few of the threads on CI with any interest at all. And the ones I do read I usually abandon with a ho-hum after the first 50 or so replies. But in your case, we sense you’re the real deal. Not that we have any present interest in SSPX. No, our interest now is only in SSPX’s historical past, leading to its now chaotic present. We tend to agree with the seer that Menzingen’s time is up. Our Lady is fed up with that organization, and has given Fellay & Co. their walking papers.  Keep up the good work."
cathinfo.com/sspx-resistance-news/sspx-article-on-bishop-huounder/

Certainly your sudden lack of interest has nothing to do with your flip-flop!

Howlingsworth-

That's an interesting comment, which highlights your own immaturity (even at your advanced age, which is most undignified), since this is what you wrote previously:

"Thank you, X, for continued additions to your Catalog of Compromise. I just added #41 to my file. You have to be a person of some erudition and scholarly training. You can not possibly be numbered among us average CI plebeians. Why? You use an economy of words, i.e. no throw-away remarks, which so often characterize CI posts; no nonsensical rants to which some forum members seem especially addicted. Your English grammar and syntax are impeccable. Your knowledge of the situation historically suggests that you were, (at one time anyway), deeply immersed in the affairs of SSPX, and/or that you probably had more than a passing acquaintance with ABL.  I follow few of the threads on CI with any interest at all. And the ones I do read I usually abandon with a ho-hum after the first 50 or so replies. But in your case, we sense you’re the real deal. Not that we have any present interest in SSPX. No, our interest now is only in SSPX’s historical past, leading to its now chaotic present. We tend to agree with the seer that Menzingen’s time is up. Our Lady is fed up with that organization, and has given Fellay & Co. their walking papers.  Keep up the good work."
cathinfo.com/sspx-resistance-news/sspx-article-on-bishop-huounder/

Certainly your sudden lack of interest has nothing to do with your flip-flop!

Howlingsworth-

That's an interesting comment, which highlights your own immaturity (even at your advanced age, which is most undignified), since this is what you wrote previously:

"Thank you, X, for continued additions to your Catalog of Compromise. I just added #41 to my file. You have to be a person of some erudition and scholarly training. You can not possibly be numbered among us average CI plebeians. Why? You use an economy of words, i.e. no throw-away remarks, which so often characterize CI posts; no nonsensical rants to which some forum members seem especially addicted. Your English grammar and syntax are impeccable. Your knowledge of the situation historically suggests that you were, (at one time anyway), deeply immersed in the affairs of SSPX, and/or that you probably had more than a passing acquaintance with ABL.  I follow few of the threads on CI with any interest at all. And the ones I do read I usually abandon with a ho-hum after the first 50 or so replies. But in your case, we sense you’re the real deal. Not that we have any present interest in SSPX. No, our interest now is only in SSPX’s historical past, leading to its now chaotic present. We tend to agree with the seer that Menzingen’s time is up. Our Lady is fed up with that organization, and has given Fellay & Co. their walking papers.  Keep up the good work."
cathinfo.com/sspx-resistance-news/sspx-article-on-bishop-huounder/

Certainly your sudden lack of interest has nothing to do with your flip-flop!

Sean, when you post as your "X" personality, you are straight-forward, mature and factually based.  When you revert to plain 'ol Sean posts, you can be antagonistic, arrogant, and only tangentially factual.  It's like Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde.