I am sure many of you have probably seen Fr. Laisney's rebuttal of Bishop Williamson's (BW) EC 281 of Dec. 1, 2012, Various Churches. It is very disappointing to see words being put into BW's mouth, silently condemning him for "false ideas" about the Church. BW has always desired to be absolutely faithful to the teaching and leadership of Archbishop Lefebvre (ABL), that is clear by everything he says and writes, and his words should be interpreted as such. For example, Fr. L. accuses BW of saying that the Catholic Church exists only in a part of the Church (the "Traditionalists"), and not in the Official Church, thereby depriving it of its divine constitution, i.e. the hierarchy. This is absurd, not only because of what BW affirms in the end of his letter (about the wheat and chaff), but also because if this were true, the "Traditionalist" part would lose one of its marks: APOSTOLICITY! BW states that the Conciliar Church (which is most of the Official Church) is rot on the apple, not a separate apple. There have been many times in Church history when the hierarchy has been in error, immorality, and sometimes downright chaos (the Great Schism). It is up to God to bring it back around, as He has always done. Ironically, its seems that EC 281 in fact paraphrases the quotes from ABL given at the end of Fr. L's refutation!
Sadly, this is just another example of the Society's change in orientation.
P.S. BW's lions example was probably not the most logical in the book, but it is easy to see what he means!