Bishop Fellay and Father Schmidberger directly deposit a criminal complaint against Father Schoonbroodt before the Public Prosecutor of the Belgians
 
Since June 21, 2011, the Superior of the SSPX and Father Schmidberger filed a criminal complaint with the Public Prosecutor of Belgium, against Father Paul Schoonbroodt, the last "excommunicated" living of holy 1988.
Taking the example of the former "bishop" Conciliar de Liège, the present and former successors of Archbishop Lefebvre hysterically persecute the priest who founded the Caramel of Quiévrain with the help of Archbishop Lefebvre and received the support of Archbishop to build his church, despite the persecution he suffered in the civil part of the Conciliar Church.

 And it is as indicated verbally that he has provided the policeman who questioned the abbot Schoonbroodt that:

 It shows three charges, provided that the abbot Schoonbroodt could learn about it in the absence of the possibility of access to the written complaint made ​​to him:
The association of St. Pius X Suresnes accused the abbot Schoonbroodt theft of intellectual property owned by the SSPX on public sermons of Archbishop Lefebvre.
Bishop Fellay and Maximilian Krah accuse the abbot Schoonbroodt libel for referring to the association's financial Bishop and business lawyer in the joint management of several investment companies.
Bishop Fellay and Maximilian Krah also accuse the abbot Schoonbroodt of racism and xenophobia.

 Faced with these startling accusations from the two successors of Archbishop Lefebvre, Father Schoonbroodt made ​​a statement in which he strongly rejects these accusations.

This unprecedented action of Bishop Fellay and Father Schmidberger, justified by their common will to block the release of the full sermons of Archbishop Lefebvre they keep hidden for 20 years, sets out in broad daylight that Bishop Fellay and the Father Schmidberger run now for the Conciliar Church maçonnisée globalized and the apostate priest Ratzinger-Benedict XVI.

 And they show publicly their ulterior motives: Bishop Fellay and Father Schmidberger behave in real enemies determined the abbot Schoonbroodt while in the same direction, they seek to curry favor and friendship of Father Ratzinger apostate Benedict XVI. The bishop and the Swiss German priest, his guru, have clearly chosen their side: that of the Conciliar Church globalized Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ and rejection of the battle of Archbishop Lefebvre against this apostate church Conciliar to preserve the Catholic priesthood sacrificial VALID sacramentally.

There has been an addition concerning the defence lawyer Dr Schaller, as well as the author’s Moral and Morale Re-armament Campaign website.


This is an eye-witness report by Michele Renouf about the 4th of July appeal of HE Bishop Williamson, as the only British presence:


Williamson-Process: his presence: REGENSBURG 4th JULY 2011

Even having attended the Regensburg Court hearing it is difficult to assess what effect the presence of Bishop Williamson would have been on the useful impact of his case to awaken public awareness – (as I would wish the SSPX to see it!) – the chance to re-institute and focus the minds of 1.1billion RCs plus others worldwide, on the pragmatic warnings in the New Testament, specifically:

1.) about the enslaving power of usury and 'media' bullying over persons and cultural sovereignty:

a: for instance why, in telling parables, Pontius Pilate washes his hands of Jєωιѕн Law...due to his fear of organised Jєωιѕн subversion against Rome;
b: for instance, why Jesus displays active contempt for the exploitative Temple moneychangers; and

2.) about the ethical incompatibility of the plausibly-argued yet deceptive concept of "ʝʊdɛօ-Christianity".  This hyphenation [ʝʊdɛօ-Christianity] is a swindle, since Judaism is by its nature anti-gentile, while Christianity has been substantially de-Judaised in Classically gentile culture for two millennia.

Oddly enough, I learnt something more about the dilemma of the SSPX on my way, rather than at the court hearing in Regensburg (and that was what I was trying to explain to Sylvia Stolz [German lawyer who was given a three-year prison sentence and debarred from practising law for five years for the reason that she defended ‘too well’ the publisher/revisionist Ernst Zündel in court] when the journalists must have been snapping the photograph they took to use for their piece).  It was this:

As it happened, whilst waiting at Munich airport by the carousel for my luggage to arrive, I noticed someone likewise waiting, sitting nearby reading a Bible.  As I do, I went up to him to enquire if he had heard of the SSPX and what he thought about the persecution of Bishop Williamson who queries modern day Jew-ish accounts of history ... to learn that indeed he himself was one of the SSPX's priestly members!

I then asked if he would be attending the court hearing on the morrow (4th July).  He said he was just going off on holiday, and even so, due to the extremely fragile state of the Society's German sector on this issue – (the mere mention of which, he said, instantly draws forth a deluge to drown any sympathiser) – that in any case he dare not attend without first having asked the Society's permission.  Of course I ventured that he, like the good Bishop, would be acting in the role-model manner of the Society's founder who had to be disobedient in order to be Obedient.

An intellectually objective, steadfastly pleasant man – (even as I complained to him about what I took to be the feeble attitude of the German sector towards supporting the Society's most rigorous Bishop) – he patiently explained their knife-edge position.  On hearing from him how one of the SSPX high schools had been closed down, I asked whether this had occurred before or after the predatory entrapment laid for the Bishop via Swedish TV.  Apparently the high school closure occurred BEFORE.  Ah, then the inevitable pressure to close down the SSPX (because of, no doubt, its adherence to the traditionally inherent warnings about the predatory тαℓмυdic exponents) in Germany did not commence with the anti-h0Ɩ0cαųstianity heresy of Bishop Williamson.  This being so, then in the new political arena which suddenly I saw, the Society must not allow itself to believe that it is his "heresy" and not the oxymoronically hyphenated ʝʊdɛօ-Christianity heresy (as ushered in with the Vatican2 fraud) which is the real problem.  

In other words the Society's enemies must not be allowed to camouflage what is really going on.  For if the Society is given the misleading signal to believe it is Williamson's Revisionism and not Jєωιѕн anti-gentile subversion that is aiming to remove the warning against тαℓмυdic subversion (as in traditional Christian teaching), then the SSPX battle for the disoriented minds of the 1.1 billion RCs will be a dead loss.  ("Saul" not "Paul", as it were, will have triumphed! – and a first opportunity towards building a fearless assertion of Revisionism's right to demand source-criticism without privileged exception would have gone unrisen.)  A very great double pity indeed since at present the SSPX has access to a larger, organised following than has Revisionism.  After all, on this theme of h0Ɩ0cαųstianity (which has usurped the spiritual and the historical truth, respectively), both SSPX and Revisionists serve to expose the self-same subversive, swindling influence.

I glimpsed then, what might be a fuller picture of the dilemma and its paradox.  For if Bishop Williamson had decided to come to Regensburg (bringing himself to the fore by attending), we would all stand less of a chance of winning at the end of the day!  The end of the day being ... as it only can be, at this stage, given Occupied German law ... when the public is continually exposed to the argument and maybe begins to wonder at the merits or otherwise of his case.  After all, at this stage there would be no chance given for him to win the Revisionist case!  Sylvia [Stolz] had thought that had the Bishop 'talked', then despite his inevitable imprisonment the public would start doing the talking.  But I did not have the heart to say that, regrettably, no general public or even a suitably outraged international legal community was heard to talk about a young female lawyer's [Sylvia Stolz] imprisonment for simply defending her client "too well".

Having now attended the 4th of July hearing, I have high hopes that we can look forward, at this stage, to a certain reduction of the fear barrier in our de-conditioning of public opinion ... now that the case has "a Dr Schaller" [i.e. in 2006 he was successfully using strictly legalese methods when he obtained the release of the British historian David Irving from Vienna prison. He also took over from Sylvia Stolz the defence of the publisher/revisionist Ernst Zündel,] for a lawyer in Professor Dr Weiler and his son. Together they act in a similar way, aiming simply to undermine the indictment by adhering strictly to a legalese strategy (rather than fighting for morality in law or for the application of the forensic norms of the Revisionist method).  I mean, Attorney Professor Weiler will have tried to enter all evidence he can (all of which must be in at this closing stage) before taking the case up to the next two 'higher' legal stages ... which hopefully the public will get to hear about!  That is what the Predator always dreads and at which point he generally backs down (such as in the Töben extradition case when the Crown Prosecution – acting on behalf of the German state – lost the initial stage, and then withdrew their Appeal rather than risk the case being openly dissected in our Parliament.)

Once Professor Weiler wins (as he can) by legalese methods and the Bishop is acquitted of "intention" to break "German law" which he clearly did not have - (since he was tricked at the end of a lengthy interview into giving those six minutes, unrelated to the supposed theme, but which were the main reason why the journalists had been commissioned to use as an attack on the SSPX) - then the Society's gullible leader and its subversive Judaic Predator will have only jelly to stand on when trying to nail the blame for SSPX closures in Germany on Williamson ( rather than recognise that it is the Predator's mission to close down the SSPX because of its faithfulness to the last vestige of pragmatic usefulness in the New Testament which is its warnings about Judaic behaviour ).  This is one reason why it would be important for the German court to see the full footage of the interview, but the judges refused to subpoena this from the Swedish broadcasters, or to require the testimony of the Swedish journalists, if necessary by conference video link.  This refusal to set the Bishop's six-minute "h0Ɩ0cαųst" heresy comments in their original context may be a basis for later appeals in the higher courts – which could overturn the Bishop's persecution by ruling that judges in the lower courts had erred.

In sum:  An apt stage-set sign of this religious heresy trial on the wall in the Regensburg Courtroom is its fractured Cross. Sculpted out of two metal bars bent and disconnected into an inverted 'L' and an up-sidedown 'L', this ineffectual Crucifix oversaw the usual sixty attendees ( comprising press and public, with briefly three TV crews ) plus judiciary, and said it all!  However, with the next court hearing of the British Bishop's case to be held in Nuremberg, this promises to re-open a can of worms (vigorous in claiming, as did five US judges in 1946, that "history goes by evidence not emotion")!  

For the RC world at large to see it is because of SSPX's faithfulness to these pragmatic warnings that its existence is being threatened – (eg in England it was denied rights to buy a church property in Manchester) – this alone could be a potent force for reversing Vatican2's post-modernist fuzziness and thus the restitution of the better part of Christian faith which is its anti-Judaic, Buddhist clear-thinking freedom from greed and vanity.  Judaism is ethically incompatible with the inseparable four Classical Virtues and the eight Christian Virtues which, inherently, do not aim like the Judiac Kol Nidre Prayer, for the nullification of oaths and vows to be made in the future, especially with gentiles unwarned nowadays by a fuzzied-down NT!  

How keenly I urged that attentive priest at Munich airport to take a chance and tell the SSPX mis-leader Bishop Fellay:
Do not lead like an irresponsibly "nice" mother who only talks to her children about the similarity between dolphins and sharks.

Michele Renouf

http://www.Jєωιѕнrepublic.com/
(this is the author’s Moral and Morale Re-armament Campaign website)

http://cathinfo-warning-pornography!/Ignis_Ardens/index.php?showtopic=7525&st=50

Quote

Kindly stop insulting people!! It is not the first time I have told you.

Why is it so difficult for some people to attend to the relevant point of this thread entitled 'Bishop Williamson's appeal'? At least, Michele Renouf did attend the hearing - as the ONLY PERSON FROM BRITAIN!!! and she has made some very valuable points not only regarding Christianity, but also any further stage of the case.

Anybody reading these totally out of context, ridiculous and below-the-belt comments must wonder if this really is a Catholic forum, as there is no Christian charity evident at all. Furthermore, the content matter of the report appears to be too much above anybody's capabilities for a constructive comment.

Nemmersdorf has experienced insults and below the belt comments on a regular basis over at the Ignis Ardens forum. It's one thing to make a constructive comment but this Ashmolean throws insults. It's not right and certainly not Christian to do this.

Dear Readers,

for nearly two months now, our website virgo-maria.org has been attacked by Bishop Fellay and the neo-SSPX who are abusing of the american law of the DMCA about the copyright. They abuse of this law in order to censore any kind of journalistic comment from Virgo-Maria.org.

By his behavior Bishop Fellay fails against the virtue of justice like it is required by the 7th and 8th commandments and manifests an inacceptable way of acting on the side of a Catholic bishop.

We will keep you informed of the following. From now on, we ask you to help us by your prayers and your financial support, so that we can keep on with the truth. We thank you very much.

Let's continue the right fight
Father Paul Schoonbroodt

Now Bishop Williamson's new attorney who is rubber-stamped by the Bishop Williamson hating Bishop Fellay, again invoked Mr Krah as a "witness" who took the chance and again defamed the good Bishop Williamson basically as a crazy idiot and worse. See John's quotations of the Zionist newspaper "Die Süddeutsche" in his opening post.

This indicates that this new attorney is not better than the two attorneys before. 2nd was the communist Green party man Mr Loßmann, and 1st was the SSPX attorney and Zionist/Jew Mr Krah.
Probably Menzingen would not have rubber-stamped the new attorney otherwise.

I have been under the impression it was the attorney who called Krah as witness. Now a friend just told me he assumed that it is the Court who called Krah. I'm going to check this.

I read the discussion on +Williamsons trial already for a while, and I cannot agree with you, Ethelred. Neither the h0Ɩ0cαųst nor the finance crisis is the business of the SSPX. The SSPX is only for saving the doctrine for the time of the crisis of the Church. And the vast majority of faithful are devout Catholics, but will never accept if their faith is abused for a political agenda. The SSPX is quite heterogenious. So, there are a plenty of people who aren´t interested in politics as well. But they can be good Catholics either.

I have never met with Dr. Krah, but I know people who have, and most of them had a very good impression of him. He is a SSPX-faithful, attending mass, and his legal actions and political advises seem to be quite useful and brought success. So, no wonder that he is well accepted by the leadership. Personally, he is described as friendly, polite, smart, and with good sense of humour.

When all the SSPX leaders as +Fellay and Fr. Pfluger, who is a very decent and devout priest, I met him in person, and all the others, do not support +Williamson in his political views - maybe it is because he is simply wrong?

I just want to tell you and all others that I trust in the SSPX leadership. I see no reason to distrust. I think, +Fellay is doing a pretty good job. And your arguments, dear Ethelred, do even strengthen my position. You write so much about the Euro which will collapse in two years and about the soon coming armaggedon etc. Sorry, I have heard such stuff since I´m with the SSPX. Nothing ever happens. And should it happen? Will it be to the glory of God if there is a revolution in Europe? Probably not. And if +Williamsons attorney calls Dr. Krah to witness, he will know why and for what reason. Even Lady Reouf did not attack Krah in her posting about the Regensburg trial. So she is fine, the attorney is fine, +Fellay is fine with that - only you who wasn´t there is not.  

And the attack of the French SSPX against these Belgian sedisvacantists - what´s wrong with it? Virgo Maria slandered the SSPX over years, including +Williamson. To me it seems that there is a smart and efficient consultant who is well connected into the media, economy, and politics and who uses this advantage to help the SSPX. That´s a good thing, isn´t it? Maybe we should send him an email and ask him for a statement. It´s only just to give people the chance to explain. Especially when it is another Catholic. You should know the 9th commandment!

Maximilian Krah publicly claimed that he was an "unimpeachable Catholic."

When his public Facebook presentation was noted by outraged Catholics some very interesting insights into the diabolical character that is Maximilian Krah mysteriously disappeared from his Facebook account.

So, for the public record:

http://cathinfo-warning-pornography!/Ignis_Ardens/i...dpost&p=9654823

QUOTE  
JMKViking
Has anyone viewed the facebook page of M. Krah? https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=125...iends&v=friends

I personally find a few interesting things on the page of a reported practicing Catholic and a 'traditionalist' at that. And among his 'friends' he is linked to the Israel Embassy of Berlin. I suppose that would make sense in his profession? And in Activities/Interests he lists Donald Rumsfeld. Very interesting indeed. He also is friends with the old chamber pot keeper J. Christopher Pryor.

QUOTE  
AdoramusTe
Interesting also is that he lists Madonna among his favourite artists and the 'erotic drama' 9 1/2 Weeks as among his favourite movies, a description of which I will not post here as it is quite explicit! Those who are interested may read Wikipedia's article on it. If he is a Traditional Catholic then certainly he has given in to the world!

QUOTE  
Elizabeth
Public admiration of [sic]Madonna is an endorsement of pure blasphemy, not to mention pornography.

QUOTE  
JMKViking
Someone has apparently taken notice of the publicity generated due to M. Krah's FACEBOOK page...

9 1/2 weeks is absent from the page - REMOVED
Madonna is no longer a 'musical' entry - REMOVED  

Why is this pornographic lusting creep allowed access to the St. Therese Girl's School in Germany?

Click on the graphic at the link to make it bigger.

St Theresien Gymnasium http://www.theresienstiftung.de/ueber-uns/...nsstruktur.html

The whole thing makes me sick to the bottom of my stomach.