Quote from: John Grace

Quote

I am not interested in that British Krahgate denying forum anymore. They're no friends of Bishop Williamson.

Ignis Ardens has shot itself in the foot.

Of course. I think that happened a few months before closing Krahgate. I think it happened when we opened it in the first place!

Still, it's not a mortal wound, and it would be nice if some people didn't keep shooting Ignis in the foot at regular intervals.

Clare, why do you think IA keeps getting cut down? It wasn't fair that Ethelred's posts were deleted. Your forum seems to be very Bishop Fellay friendly. As soon as he got upset about that thread on your forum, you locked it and basically said "Sorry, won't happen again". Now it appears your forum members must suffer because of it.

The mention of lawyers reminded me of:

Krahgate Revisited

Quote

http://cathinfo-warning-pornography!/Ignis_Ardens/index.php?showtopic=6517&hl=

Re-reading recently the initial posting of William of Norwich, I came to realise that it was a positive gold mine of information. But, like gold mines, it was necessary to do a lot more digging so as to find the true nuggets of value present. Therefore, this posting may be quite long, but I hope that it will be fruitful and that it will serve the cause of truth.
The first thing that I would recommend to those who are disturbed or worried about the facts surrounding Krahgate is to take a look around the Emba-Global website in order to discover precisely what this Business School is all about. You may access it at www.emba-global.com


Here is how the sales pitch of this company starts:
“The EMBA-Global programme brings together an elite international network of business
professionals. Through the world-renowned faculty and unique global curriculum they have
exclusive access to the most illuminating ideas, ground-breaking research and innovative
international business practices. Whether students choose EMBA-Global Americas and
Europe or EMBA-Global Asia, together they will help create the future of global business.”
There is nothing unusual here folks, but take away with you that it is all about “going global.”
Under the section “Global Network” this idea is reinforced in this way:
“EMBA-Global students typically operate at an international level, working from different offices around the world, or managing teams in different locations. They represent an array of functions, sectors and nationalities. However, they share a keenness to challenge common perspectives and think on a global scale.”
Take away with you the idea that all those participating in this course are thinking globally and want to act globally.
Under the same section read this:
“On completing EMBA-Global, you become a life-long member of an exceptional, international alumni network totalling more than 75,500. Right from day one of the programme, you have access to this unparalleled pool of knowledge, business experience and networking opportunities.”
Take away with you the idea that this is no mere business school, but one that has as its intention to create a global managerial elite that will stay in touch with one another in the various businesses that their students embrace.


Under the section “Programme Details” read:
“Core courses are taught in a residential study block format that means you study over several consecutive days per month - alternating between London and New York.”
Take away with you the idea that you can drop in and see your friends fundraising for Tel Aviv University. Convenience itself – killing two birds (perhaps even Palestinians who are not “friends” of Tel Aviv University) with one stone!
From the same section read this:
“EMBA-Global has one intake each May and runs for 20 months.”
In the section on “Admission Requirements” please note:
“The calibre and diversity of EMBA-Global students is one of the key strengths that differentiates the programme from the world's other executive MBAs. The admissions process ensures that you will be studying alongside the brightest and the best.”
Take away with you the idea that this is the place to be for globalist wannabees.
In the same section, note some of the other requirements:
“a successful career trajectory with progressive experience over a number of years, managing people, projects, budgets or other resources.”
“transnational responsibilities or evidence that you are working towards these.”
“a worldwide perspective, with international exposure and aspirations, and an interest in building global networks.”


Go to the section on “Fees” and read:
The fees for the May 2011 intake of the EMBA-Global Americas and Europe programme are $144,156* (the equivalent of roughly £93,000 or €110,000.)
Fees include:
• Tuition
• Course materials, including most textbooks
• Accommodation for all teaching blocks through the first three terms
• Accommodation for the required International Seminar or Assignment.**
The first * indicates that fees may change at any time. The second ** indicates “One International Assignment or Seminar is included in the tuition fee. You may take one additional Seminar or Assignment, provided seats are available. If you choose to undertake an additional International Assignment or Seminar, there is a fee of US$4,000. Airfare for all study blocks and International Seminars and Assignments is the responsibility of the student.”
Needless to say, additional seminars and assignments are “encouraged” in order to boost your “networking experience.” But take away with you this idea: that the fees are extortionate for a five term, twenty month course. However it should be noted that if you, or the company that you work for, has the money to undergo this training you are clearly one of “the brightest and the best.”
Go and look at the section, Emba-Global Class of 2012, and look at the list of companies who have people registered on this course, which we are told leads to “friendships for life built through this intense transformational experience” - Citigroup, Maersk, MTV, Ericsson, HSBC Bank, Morgan Stanley, BNP Paribas, Goodyear, Cisco, Google, Microsoft, Nomura Holdings, CBS, Deutsche Bank, Hoffman La Roche, World Bank BASF, Merrill Lynch, Barclays Bank, Royal Bank of Scotland, Credit Suisse.
One final point before we cut to the chase.


Under “admission requirements,” it says:
“Employer support for the time you will be out of the office is required to apply to the programme. You must provide a signed letter from an authorised person within your company stating that they agree to allow you the required time away from the office to complete the programme. The authorised person may be your department head, president, CEO or head of HR.”
I regret that the run-up to the point has been lengthy, but the background is vital in understanding the portrait being painted. We are, naturally, coming to understand the background of Mr. Krah as a member of the Emba-Global Class of 2012.
In the Class of 2012 mug shots that you can access online, you will see that a standard format has been used: the student’s name, the student’s nationality, the student’s professional position, and then the company worked for. This is where things become interesting for avid students of Krahgate.
Max gives his name and nationality and profession, the latter being “lawyer.” The obvious company that ought to appear here is the legal firm of which he is a partner:
Link: Fetsch Rechtsanwälte http://www.dasoertliche.de/?id=10700323337...&arkey=14612000
Surprisingly it is not. Well then, ought it not to be Dello Sarto given that he is listed as the Manager of that company?


Link: Dello Sarto AG
http://translate.google.co.uk/translate?hl...D813%26prmd%3Db
It ought to be, but it is not. He lists as his employer the Jaidhofer Privatstiftung, the private Austrian Foundation, founded in 2006 by the SSPX. Why this choice? There must be a reason, but there cannot be many. Could it be that his legal business is not doing well, or could it be that alongside Citigroup, Microsoft and Credit Suisse, it looks rather puny, specially for someone who clearly wants to be among “the brightest and the best”? Whatever the reason, why not Dello Sarto given that he is listed as the Manager of that newly minted entity? Perhaps it too does not cut the ice? Why? Perhaps we need to scroll up a page or two to remind ourselves of something – that one of the entry requirements is “a successful career trajectory with progressive experience over a number of years, managing people, projects, budgets or other resources.” Clearly, for poor Max to get into the circle of “the brightest and the best” he had to demonstrate that he had wide experience and was used to handling “budgets” [meaning serious money] and it is plain that his peers at Deutsche Bank, Morgan Stanley and the rest have that experience in aces.
Go back to Emba-Global Class of 2012 and read the profiles of any selection of the students, and you should be struck by one thing: that the Jaidhofer Privatstiftung looks totally out of place if it is just a small business legal structure to aid the growth of the SSPX. When Max sat down to fill out his online application form, he would have been forced to choose the business structure that presented him to his potential Emba-Global colleagues in the best possible light.


One thing is for sure. Given that the Jaidhofer Privatstiftung is listed as his employer it means per his application - “Employer support for the time you will be out of the office is required to apply to the programme. You must provide a signed letter from an authorised person within your company stating that they agree to allow you the required time away from the office to complete the programme. The authorised person may be your department head, president, CEO or head of HR” – THAT SOMEONE AT THE HEAD OF THIS SPPX FOUNDATION AUTHORISED KRAH’S ADMISSION TO THE PROGRAMME.


This undeniable fact – because like so much else that has been brought to light is in the public domain – leads to a number of questions:
1. Who in authority signed this letter?
2. Why was he given this letter?
3. What possible benefit could the SSPX hope to gain by enrolling this Zionist agent on a massively expensive course designed for recruitment to a global managerial elite in thrall to the nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr and its worship of Mammon?
4. Did Krah pay for this course out of his own pocket or did the Foundation pay?
5.If he did, is the Jaidhofer Privatstiftung paying for his time when he is not working for them?
But the big question is this: WHAT IS THE JAIDHOFER PRIVATSTIFTUNG, AND WHY DID KRAH BELIEVE THAT THIS WOULD LOOK GOOD ON HIS APPLICATION TO EMBA-GLOBAL? THIS IS THE SIX MILLION DOLLAR QUESTION: WHAT IS THE JAIDHOFER PRIVATSTIFTUNG, AND WHAT WAS THERE ABOUT IT THAT CONVINCED THE EMBA-GLOBAL CROWD THAT MAX WAS ONE OF THEIR KIND? ANSWER THAT QUESTION, AND WE MAY BE CLOSE TO ANSWERING WHY A ZIONIST HAS SO MUCH CONTROL OF THE SSPX’S FINANCES AND WHY THE SPIRIT OF ARCHBISHOP LEFEBVRE HAS BEEN INCREASINGLY AND OBVIOUSLY PUSHED ASIDE IN FAVOUR OF AN INDULT-LIKE “TRADITIONALISM”
POSTSCRIPT
Credo posted the following recently on the Krahgate File from an anonymous source, but one that can be substantiated by a Google search:
Posted: Dec 9 2010, 04:51 PM
Dello Sarto AG
Timeline of Dello Sarto AG
Incorporation Date: 17-12-08
Company Start Date: 19-1-09
Board Members:
See: http://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/u/p/v/dello_sa...3.033.031-9.htm
Bernard Fellay
Emeric Baudot
Niklaus Pfluger
Maximilian Krah
Company Auditors:
19-1-09 to 8-6-10 Grant Thornton auditing AG
8-6-10 till present: Fidartis Revisions AG
Interesting facts about Fidartis Revisions AG:
One of the company’s signature authority is a Mr. Peter Josef Müller
Some interesting facts regarding Mr. Peter Josef Müller :-
Director of Company: Laetitia AG since 29-5-09
Administration board signatory of Laetitia AG: Maximilian Krah (individual signatory)
Peter Josef Müller replaced Peter Hochstrasser on the Board of Fidartis Revisions AG on the 9-7-10 with him having Joint Signatory Authority. Furthermore, Dello Sarto AG appointed Fidartis Revisions AG as auditors the month previous.
Whoever the anonymous source was, I thank you for your diligence in getting to the root of what is becoming more and more of an enigma. For the record, I would like to draw the attention of readers to the following small, but significant, points.


1. Both Muller and Krah joined the Board of Laetitia AG on May 29, 2009, and both have individual signatory rights. In fact the company was actually registered commercially on that very day.
2. The address of Laetitia AG is given as c/o Bader Law Firm, Grafenauweg 6, 6304, Zug/Train, Switzerland. “Zug” is the German for the town, “Train” the French name. A number of other firms, not associated with the SSPX, also operate from this address, and which give the Bader Law Firm as their point of reference. It would appear, therefore, that this address is little more than a brass plate on a postal box. Why not just list the law firm’s address in Zurich, specially given that any mail to Zug/Train is going to be redirected anyway?
3. Interestingly, the address of Dello Sarto, of which Krah is the named Manager, is exactly the same as that of Laetitia AG. Moreover, when you click on “Contact” for Dello Sarto or for Laetitia AG at http://www.moneyhouse.ch you find that there is no telephone number, fax number, email address or website listed.
4. In other words, Laetitia was commercially registered as a company in Switzerland just ten days before Fidartis Revisions AG took over as auditors of Dello Sarto AG, and Muller joined the board of Fidartis just one month later. A lot of legal/commercial work in such a short time.
If you wish to check out most of the details on companies given here, go to http://www.moneyhouse.ch
and type whatever it is you need to confirm.


5.A Google search for “Bader Law Firm, Switzerland” brings up nothing obvious, but google “BADERTSCHER Rechtsanwälte AG (Zurich)” and you will find it at
http://www.internationallawoffice.com/dire...47-4d5d5e739909.
Here is the content of the page. Please read it through to the end in order to grasp that the company associated with the SSPX-affiliate Dello Sarto is one more of those who are dedicated “to global interests and networks.”
BADERTSCHER Rechtsanwälte AG (Zurich)
• Address
Muhlebachstrasse 32
PO Box 769
Zurich CH 8024
• Country
Switzerland
• Phone
41 44 266 20 66
• Fax
41 44 266 20 70
• Email
info@b-legal.ch
• Website
www.b-legal.ch
• Offices
Zug, Zurich
• Languages
English, French, German, Hebrew, Italian
Work Areas
Administrative & Public Law, Administrative Law, Antitrust, Arbitration & Litigation, Banking, Banking & Finance, Bankruptcy, Capital Markets, Civil Law, Commercial Law, Company & Commercial, Competition, Construction, Contract, Corporate & Commercial, Corporate Law, Corporate/Commercial, Data Protection, E-commerce, Employment, Energy, Environmental Law, Estate Planning, Estate Planning & Administration, Finance, Health Care, Information & Communication Technology, Information Technology, Inheritance Law, Insolvency, Insurance, Insurance & Reinsurance, Intellectual Property, International Private Law, Liability, Litigation, Mergers & Acquisitions, Penal Litigation, Private Client, Public Law, Tax, Technology Law, Telecommunications, Transaction Law


Firm Description
BADERTSCHER is a nationally and internationally reputed Swiss law firm.
Our attorneys are members of the Zurich and the Swiss Bar Association as well as of various international law associations.
Most of them have an American or English post graduate degree and/or working experience abroad.
Our offices are located downtown Zurich.


BADERTSCHER is committed to the future, dedicated to quality and growth, involved in the rapid and important commercial and legal developments.
We advise in private and public law, focusing on commercial law.
Our clients are Swiss and foreign corporations, private individuals and governmental organizations.
Just like our clients, we are positioned at the forefront of events: one of our strengths is competent advice in new and complex areas of the law.
Specialization and commitment to quality and effective solution-oriented advice enable our attorneys to follow the rapid developments and to support our clients with our expertise in interdisciplinary fields such as restructuring, privatisations and cross-border transactions.
We stand for a continuous professional training of our attorneys, including post graduate programs.
Our attorneys also contribute to the academic and legal policy developments by publishing on a regular basis on the most current legal issues and by participating in national and international associations, experts commissions and seminars.


Part of the global legal marketplace
Close cooperations with leading foreign law firms without being bound to any exclusivity allow us to always offer the best quality legal services to our clients also in complex transactions involving several jurisdictions.
We also maintain well-established contacts with experts in fields other than law.
The languages skills of our attorneys enable us to render our services in English, German, Italian, French and Hebrew.


ONE FINAL OBSERVATION:
It is noteworthy that this firm deals in the international commercial language, Hebrew. More significant, however, is the question: WHO ADVISED THE SSPX TO ENLIST THIS LEGAL FIRM AND WHY? Is it really the case that the preservation of the Society’s patrimony and the raising of money – small sums according to Fr. Laisney’s recent posting – for the expansion of the Society’s work requires such high-powered and expensive lawyers, or is that I have misunderstood something and all these people are giving their time and effort free of charge, or even, “members of our faithful”?

John,  Res ipsa loquitur

Everybody who knows the "h0Ɩ0cαųst" lie, its basing of today's nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr (see Mr. Q quotation below), therefore the total Jєωιѕн control of Germany and many other countries, also knows that this show trial in a "German" court virtually cannot end with a just sentence.

Now Bishop Williamson's new attorney who is rubber-stamped by the Bishop Williamson hating Bishop Fellay, again invoked Mr Krah as a "witness" who took the chance and again defamed the good Bishop Williamson basically as a crazy idiot and worse. See John's quotations of the Zionist newspaper "Die Süddeutsche" in his opening post.

This indicates that this new attorney is not better than the two attorneys before. 2nd was the communist Green party man Mr Loßmann, and 1st was the SSPX attorney and Zionist/Jєω Mr Krah.
Probably Menzingen would not have rubber-stamped the new attorney otherwise.

Maybe the new attorney thinks that by letting declare Bishop Williamson as an idiotic fool he could win the trial? Well, he can't. Not one "h0Ɩ0cαųst" show trial has been won in Jєωιѕн controlled Germany, no matter how important or unimportant the "h0Ɩ0cαųst" disputer was, because the "h0Ɩ0cαųst" world of lies is at stake.

@ "The smart Sheep": At the moment you can't yet "fight for his freedom and ours" in a totally Jєωιѕн controlled country like the "Bundesrepublik Deutschland" (Federal Republic of Germany, FRG). You can pray, of course.


If the Bishop loses this appeal then I hope that he's letting his attorney go to the next higher court. So hopefully another appeal is in the middle or late of next year. Then the entire satanic "European Union" and the so called "Bundesrepublik Deutschland" (which is not Germany but an usurper) won't exist anymore. Just take a look at Greece and you'll see why.
So basically the good Brisith Bishop could just wait and see!


Since we cannot expect justice from this Jєωιѕн controlled "German" court, I suggest to those people who are really interested in truth and justice -- you actually can't divide the two -- to take a closer look at the Auschwitz for Dummies article.



Mr. Q quoting Bischof Williamson, as posted here or on the lukewarm IA forum on 23rd December 2010:

One may object: but Revisionism is not the battle of the SSPX. No-one with sense disputes that. But one can and one must inform oneself sufficiently in private to avoid saying in public those things such as (were) said in „Der Spiegel“, for example, that the historicity of the Six Millions „is obvious.“ That is, unless one is ready to lie, consciously or unconsciously, to the general public. As for myself, when I made that response on Swedish television, it is obvious that I was not trying to make Revisionism the battle of the SSPX; I was only trying to give a true answer to a question which is very important for western civilization. Has not an entire post-war world order been constructed on the Six Millions? In the head of Mr. Average Citizen, have they not become the measure of evil (nαzιsm) and of good (Judaism)? Yet to say that I want to make of this the battle of the SSPX is a caricature. I don’t even make it my own personal combat. I am not the „Revisionist bishop“ any more than Mgr. Lefebvre was the „rebel archbishop.“

Everybody who knows the "h0Ɩ0cαųst" lie, its basing of today's nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr (see Mr. Q quotation below), therefore the total Jєωιѕн control of Germany and many other countries, also knows that this show trial in a "German" court virtually cannot end with a just sentence.

Now Bishop Williamson's new attorney who is rubber-stamped by the Bishop Williamson hating Bishop Fellay, again invoked Mr Krah as a "witness" who took the chance and again defamed the good Bishop Williamson basically as a crazy idiot and worse. See John's quotations of the Zionist newspaper "Die Süddeutsche" in his opening post.

This indicates that this new attorney is not better than the two attorneys before. 2nd was the communist Green party man Mr Loßmann, and 1st was the SSPX attorney and Zionist/Jєω Mr Krah.
Probably Menzingen would not have rubber-stamped the new attorney otherwise.

Maybe the new attorney thinks that by letting declare Bishop Williamson as an idiotic fool he could win the trial? Well, he can't. Not one "h0Ɩ0cαųst" show trial has been won in Jєωιѕн controlled Germany, no matter how important or unimportant the "h0Ɩ0cαųst" disputer was, because the "h0Ɩ0cαųst" world of lies is at stake.

@ "The smart Sheep": At the moment you can't yet "fight for his freedom and ours" in a totally Jєωιѕн controlled country like the "Bundesrepublik Deutschland" (Federal Republic of Germany, FRG). You can pray, of course.


If the Bishop loses this appeal then I hope that he's letting his attorney go to the next higher court. So hopefully another appeal is in the middle or late of next year. Then the entire satanic "European Union" and the so called "Bundesrepublik Deutschland" (which is not Germany but an usurper) won't exist anymore. Just take a look at Greece and you'll see why.
So basically the good Brisith Bishop could just wait and see!


Since we cannot expect justice from this Jєωιѕн controlled "German" court, I suggest to those people who are really interested in truth and justice -- you actually can't divide the two -- to take a closer look at the Auschwitz for Dummies article.



Mr. Q quoting Bischof Williamson, as posted here or on the lukewarm IA forum on 23rd December 2010:

Quote from: Mr. Q quoting Bishop Williamson

One may object: but Revisionism is not the battle of the SSPX. No-one with sense disputes that. But one can and one must inform oneself sufficiently in private to avoid saying in public those things such as (were) said in „Der Spiegel“, for example, that the historicity of the Six Millions „is obvious.“ That is, unless one is ready to lie, consciously or unconsciously, to the general public. As for myself, when I made that response on Swedish television, it is obvious that I was not trying to make Revisionism the battle of the SSPX; I was only trying to give a true answer to a question which is very important for western civilization. Has not an entire post-war world order been constructed on the Six Millions? In the head of Mr. Average Citizen, have they not become the measure of evil (nαzιsm) and of good (Judaism)? Yet to say that I want to make of this the battle of the SSPX is a caricature. I don’t even make it my own personal combat. I am not the „Revisionist bishop“ any more than Mgr. Lefebvre was the „rebel archbishop.“

I agree with everything you say here. Great info.

I don't quite understand:
        " If the Bishop loses this appeal then I hope that he's letting his attorney go to the next higher court. So hopefully another appeal is in the middle or late of next year. Then the entire satanic "European Union" and the so called "Bundesrepublik Deutschland" (which is not Germany but an usurper) won't exist anymore. Just take a look at Greece and you'll see why."

But what I am thinking is, Greece was bailed out again. The Zionist are still playing the game. They have to give "a way out" to continue being secret.

America has a de facto government also and if you know this "way out" you can use it.  I was thinking along these lines when I suggest dropping the lawyer. There must be freedom groups in Germany who have found this " way out". Whether or not he goes to a higher court he must rid himself of lawyers.

sheep

I don´t quite understand why Bp. Williamson wanted to go on with his trial. There is absolutely no change of success in a German court anyway

Well, dear Pyrrhos and fellow compatriot, I can think of:
(1) The humorous Bishop Williamson larks the Jєωs and their FRG-German lackeys
or
(2) Bishop Richard "Lionheart" Williamson knows that the nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr is about to fall now.

I think (2) is probable since he regularly mentions the immanent World War III and the Chastisement (Krah & Fr. Pfluger are in rage because of this).

Well, whatever may be, I pray for the fall of the satanic European Union and the Federal Republic as well as a conversion of the home continent of the faith, culture and civilization.

This prayer I join.

Long live the Emperor of the Sacrum Romanum Imperium,
Es lebe der Kaiser des Heiligen Römischen Reiches deutscher Nation, Schutzpatron der Hl. Kirche Christi!

"The smart sheep", Greece is only the first EU country to fall. All EU countries (and USA even more) are totally indepted and will have to be "bailed out" within the fraud money system owned by the Jєωιѕн FED and their worldwide investment banks (like the giant so called "German Bank" = "Deutsche Bank" with its criminal Jєωιѕн boss Joseph Ackermann).

So in the end all European countries are doomed and will see revolutions, choos and anarchism, like you see it now in Greece.

Whilst Satan and his chosen people, the Jєωs since their Deicide, work towards this point in order to take over the control, there was always one thing they hadn't reckoned with: the all-powerful Trinitarian God!


Oh, why didn't those European nations read the "Don't borrow!" Eleison Comment from Bishop Williamson! :-)

Your right! What the all powerful Trinitarian God can do to them will be better than what we will ever be able to do or imagine.

Iceland did see the "Don't Borrow!" so did Japan and so did Lybia. Both tried or still are  fighting it. Look what happened to them ( a little conspiracy theory here).

I still think they are afraid of us, right now.  Finding out how to deal with them, understanding "the way out" and all. So many of us and so little of them. We all just have to educate ourselves and do the right thing.

sheep

 

Quote from: Ethelred

Well, dear Pyrrhos and fellow compatriot, I can think of:
(1) The humorous Bishop Williamson larks the Jєωs and their FRG-German lackeys
or
(2) Bishop Richard "Lionheart" Williamson knows that the nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr is about to fall now.

I think (2) is probable since he regularly mentions the immanent World War III and the Chastisement [...].

I kind of expected this, dear Ethelred, but I would have thought that another medium other than the German courts could be more effective.

Well, a friendly person indicated to me a third option:

(3) Some "h0Ɩ0cαųst" specialists like attorney Wolfram Nahrath sometimes find possibilities to make the "h0Ɩ0cαųst" court to abandon an action, i.e. to close the proceedings.

However, the standard media usually don't report about such cases, so in the published opinion such cases virtually don't exist. Here's the indicated link to one "h0Ɩ0cαųst" case where Nahrath managed to make a German court close the proceedings:
Kevin Käther’s questions that caused Berlin district court to drop his case
(I didn't and don't know this case, so I can't explain it.)


Now we've to recall where we know the name Nahrath from... Bishop Williamson's choose as 3rd attorney Wolfram Nahrath, because in contrast to the other attorneys he knows that the "h0Ɩ0cαųst" is a lie and actually managed to make a German "h0Ɩ0cαųst" court close the proceedings.

Since Nahrath in former times was a member of the "national socialist" party NPD, Bishop Fellay publicly threatened Bishop Williamson with expulsion if he didn't kick Nahrath (*). This shows Bishop Fellay is one-eyed because he had no problems at all with his attorney and Zionist Krah choosing Loßmann as 2nd attorney for Bishop Williamson, with Loßmann being a member of the communist i.e. "international socialist" party Die-Grünen.

So I think it's just to say that Bishop Fellay deprived Bishop Williamson of using the best attorney for his case.
Because Bishop Fellay and of course his advisers Fr. Pfluger and Krah want to please the modern world and the Jєω as its dominator, instead of always looking out for the truth and justice. By the way that's why he also thinks the current heretical pope who is totally world oriented is a great man.
Since way too many catholics do something similar, there's just one final rescue to bring truth and justice into a world virtually controlled by the Prince of Darkness and his human lackeys: God's (next) Chastisement. He that will not hear must feel!



(*) Today we know from the SSPX attorney and Zionist Krah's mouth that Bishop Williamson "is not being expelled mainly because of reasons of mercifulness". So he told in the court on 4th July. (Bischof Williamson werde »vor allem aus Gründen der Barmherzigkeit nicht aus der Bruderschaft geworfen«)
That sounds very hypocritical.

One of Our CMRI priests said to me last week.  "When the time of persecution comes, then we will see how many have the courage to remain Catholic".

 
Yes, thank you, that's very well said, dear Emerentiana!

This will be the acid test. It's easy to say or write nice words in the circle of friends or in the Internet, but it's a different thing to say and do so confronting the persecution. Which will come definitely, see the messages of Our Lady in Fatima for example. But after this her Immaculate Hearth will triumph. So our sacrifices including the death of many of us will well be worth the price.

Let's always pray that Our Lord gives us the strength to remain catholic when it is really needed!