It would also be interesting to learn what new seminarians are now taught about the world and how they are to engage with it. Almost like a rerun of the 60s conciliar changes. And always remember change creates less turbulence if brought in gently and slowly. Of course, young seminarians have no experience of the old world. They can only apply old theory to what they know.
If you recall, there was a video made in Germany, in the last year or so, showing life in one of the seminaries. When the subject of Bishop Williamson and h0Ɩ0cαųst came up, I believe they used a word such as "horrified" in thier reaction to revisionist views. We know that the administrators are h0Ɩ0cαųst narrative enforcers, so where does that leave the happless seminarian who must know that deviation means expulsion?
And of course, you are correct, the young have no sense of the true history which stands behind them. Since birth, they have been swimming in the soup of created realities. Mere clay to be moulded into slaves by the hands of the тαℓмυdic sculpture.
I can only speak from my own personal experience.
I was in the American SSPX seminary for 3 years plus 1 semester.
We learned all the truth about the Jews, mostly from one professor -- Bishop Williamson.
I was blessed to imbibe his wisdom for 3 years.
I wouldn't say that every SSPX priest is like Bishop Williamson, unfortunately. Some don't say anything one way or the other about the Jews, so one tends to give them the benefit of the doubt.
I can say with confidence that it seems "they" are looking for a different kind of seminarian (and hence, a different kind of priest) post-Bishop Williamson. They are looking for less fiery, less eccentric, less "choleric" or leader-type individuals. That is my personal experience and opinion. Take it for what it's worth.
Matthew