Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Bishop Williamson sermon from High Mass - recent conference Fr. Calderon's book  (Read 1820 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 31183
  • Reputation: +27098/-494
  • Gender: Male
Bishop Williamson sermon from High Mass - given on October 13, 2019, after a series of conferences (October 11-13) on Fr. Calderon's book, "Prometheus" which covers the big picture of Vatican II and the New Religion.

The Mass took place at Bishop Zendejas' new chapel in CT (complete with school and parish hall). 

More videos to follow. Stay tuned!

Want to say "thank you"? 
You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com


Offline Kazimierz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7387
  • Reputation: +3488/-87
  • Gender: Male
I pray and trust this conference was recorded and will be uploaded, by a diligent attendee.

(Alberta - Texas of the North.....just a whole less amount of people. Long drive to get anywhere, at least from this old bear lives.) :cowboy:
Da pacem Domine in diebus nostris
Qui non est alius
Qui pugnet pro nobis
Nisi  tu Deus noster


Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
  • *****
  • Posts: 41868
  • Reputation: +23920/-4344
  • Gender: Male
LOL, at one point +Williamson slips and calls Bergoglio "Frank" (at about 22:44).


Offline SeanJohnson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15064
  • Reputation: +9980/-3161
  • Gender: Male
LOL, at one point +Williamson slips and calls Bergoglio "Frank" (at about 22:44).
LOL, I was cracking up when he acknowledged sedevacantism as an emotional overreaction.
Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

Offline ByzCat3000

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1889
  • Reputation: +500/-141
  • Gender: Male
LOL, I was cracking up when he acknowledged sedevacantism as an emotional overreaction.
TBH my reaction when he called Francis "Frank" was just to laugh, not to conclude anything specific/dogmatic


Offline SeanJohnson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15064
  • Reputation: +9980/-3161
  • Gender: Male
TBH my reaction when he called Francis "Frank" was just to laugh, not to conclude anything specific/dogmatic
Why are you responding to me, rather than Loudestmouth?  It was not I who commented on the “Frank.”
Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

Offline ByzCat3000

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1889
  • Reputation: +500/-141
  • Gender: Male
Why are you responding to me, rather than Loudestmouth?  It was not I who commented on the “Frank.”
I mean I'm sure it has nothing to do with you being petty enough to incessantly refer to another poster as "Loudestmouth" lol

Offline SeanJohnson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15064
  • Reputation: +9980/-3161
  • Gender: Male
I mean I'm sure it has nothing to do with you being petty enough to incessantly refer to another poster as "Loudestmouth" lol
Oh yes, how dare I demean such a kind, polite man.  I could see why you would address responses to his posts to me because of that.😂
Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."


Offline roscoe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7610
  • Reputation: +617/-404
  • Gender: Male
LOL, at one point +Williamson slips and calls Bergoglio "Frank" (at about 22:44).
:cheers:
There Is No Such Thing As 'Sede Vacantism'...
nor is there such thing as a 'Feeneyite' or 'Feeneyism'

Offline ByzCat3000

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1889
  • Reputation: +500/-141
  • Gender: Male
Oh yes, how dare I demean such a kind, polite man.  I could see why you would address responses to his posts to me because of that.😂
I really haven’t actually noticed him be rude. You on the other hand...

Offline SeanJohnson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15064
  • Reputation: +9980/-3161
  • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!2
  • I really haven’t actually noticed him be rude. You on the other hand...
    That’s because you are a liar, and a moronic idiot.
    Remember: You just said talking to people like that isn’t rude, so I know you are not offended (lol).
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."


    Offline josefamenendez

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4422
    • Reputation: +2946/-199
    • Gender: Female
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Thanks for posting Matthew! The chapel looks beautiful. Hope to see it soon!

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41868
    • Reputation: +23920/-4344
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • TBH my reaction when he called Francis "Frank" was just to laugh, not to conclude anything specific/dogmatic

    Right.  I know he's not a sedevacantist, and I know that many sedevacantists call him "Frank" ... so I was merely amused by that expression coming from his lips, precisely because it was incongruous.  I would not have batted an eye at Bishop Sanborn calling him that.

    Either +Williamson had been reading some sedevacantist stuff or else he just slurred his words a bit, thinking ahead and conflating two sounds.

    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6173
    • Reputation: +3147/-2941
    • Gender: Female
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Some of the sedeprivationists and sedevacantists would not pass up an opportunity like this to try and show that +W may be a closet sedevacantist. They will "infer" that there is a connection to sedevacantism. Although why it is that they have a need to continually do this is beyond me (with both +W and +ABL). 
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29

    Offline ByzCat3000

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1889
    • Reputation: +500/-141
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Some of the sedeprivationists and sedevacantists would not pass up an opportunity like this to try and show that +W may be a closet sedevacantist. They will "infer" that there is a connection to sedevacantism. Although why it is that they have a need to continually do this is beyond me (with both +W and +ABL).
    I guess the thing is I see a distinction between probable sedeplenism and dogmatic sedeplenism.  It seems to me that Williamson and Lefebvre are/were probable sedeplenists rather than dogmatic ones, regardless of whether they are right or wrong.

    Like yes they certainly thought the pope was the pope.  It just doesn’t seem like they thought it was absolutely certain