Author Topic: Bishop Williamson sermon from High Mass - recent conference Fr. Calderon's book (Read 2388 times)

SeanJohnson · « **Reply #10 on:** October 16, 2019, 06:20:09 AM »

Quote from: ByzCat3000 on October 15, 2019, 11:54:50 PM

I really haven’t actually noticed him be rude. You on the other hand...

That’s because you are a liar, and a moronic idiot.
Remember: You just said talking to people like that isn’t rude, so I know you are not offended (lol).

josefamenendez · « **Reply #11 on:** October 16, 2019, 07:49:43 AM »

Thanks for posting Matthew! The chapel looks beautiful. Hope to see it soon!

Ladislaus · « **Reply #12 on:** October 16, 2019, 07:53:50 AM »

Quote from: ByzCat3000 on October 15, 2019, 09:04:15 PM

TBH my reaction when he called Francis "Frank" was just to laugh, not to conclude anything specific/dogmatic

Right. I know he's not a sedevacantist, and I know that many sedevacantists call him "Frank" ... so I was merely amused by that expression coming from his lips, precisely because it was incongruous. I would not have batted an eye at Bishop Sanborn calling him that.

Either +Williamson had been reading some sedevacantist stuff or else he just slurred his words a bit, thinking ahead and conflating two sounds.

Meg · « **Reply #13 on:** October 16, 2019, 12:03:02 PM »

Some of the sedeprivationists and sedevacantists would not pass up an opportunity like this to try and show that +W may be a closet sedevacantist. They will "infer" that there is a connection to sedevacantism. Although why it is that they have a need to continually do this is beyond me (with both +W and +ABL).

ByzCat3000 · « **Reply #14 on:** October 16, 2019, 12:19:39 PM »

Quote from: Meg on October 16, 2019, 12:03:02 PM

Some of the sedeprivationists and sedevacantists would not pass up an opportunity like this to try and show that +W may be a closet sedevacantist. They will "infer" that there is a connection to sedevacantism. Although why it is that they have a need to continually do this is beyond me (with both +W and +ABL).

I guess the thing is I see a distinction between probable sedeplenism and dogmatic sedeplenism. It seems to me that Williamson and Lefebvre are/were probable sedeplenists rather than dogmatic ones, regardless of whether they are right or wrong.

Like yes they certainly thought the pope was the pope. It just doesn’t seem like they thought it was absolutely certain

CathInfo.com

Author Topic: Bishop Williamson sermon from High Mass - recent conference Fr. Calderon's book (Read 2388 times)

SeanJohnson

Re: Bishop Williamson sermon from High Mass - recent conference Fr. Calderon's book

josefamenendez

Re: Bishop Williamson sermon from High Mass - recent conference Fr. Calderon's book

Ladislaus

Re: Bishop Williamson sermon from High Mass - recent conference Fr. Calderon's book

Meg

Re: Bishop Williamson sermon from High Mass - recent conference Fr. Calderon's book

ByzCat3000

Re: Bishop Williamson sermon from High Mass - recent conference Fr. Calderon's book