Thank you Lad for posting the linked file.

You're welcome.  Due to all the interest, I'll try to wrap everything up in this series by next weekend and I'll have the full file download to post here.  I might break it up also into smaller-chunk .zip files because about halfway through it's already 1.2 GB in size, which may not be very practical for some users who don't have high bandwidth.

No, I'm not interested in monetizing Subtack in any way.  I personally consider attempting to profit off something that would benefit souls to border upon simony ... though I have incurred some expense myself to get this done.

I'll never upgrade my Substack or any part of it to a "paid" subscription.

Even if it's technically licit, I'd prefer not to hear from Our Lord when I pass away that I have received my reward (making money off of it), but would much rather be an even tiny / meager participant in some benefit that may have accrued to souls.

I refuse to become a grifter in the Catholic faith.  I'd rather dig ditches for a living (though my current physical constitution could not bear it) while continuing to offer services of this nature for free.

Thank you Lad for posting the linked file.

So if you just grab the MP3s, once you extract them to a folder, within the folder, sort them by the filename in ascending order and the file-naming convention I adopted will also correspond with their chronological order.  There's also a MetaData field call # which appears to be visible by default in Windows 10, but not in Windows 11, but in the latter you can make it appear by customizing the columns at the top of the Explorer window, so you can see a #, currently from 1-37 to help with ordering them also.

Thank you for your hard work so far.

Thank you for your hard work so far.

Oh, it's my pleasure, and just a few hours of work here and there, nothing compared to how hard His Excellency worked teaching these courses year after year for several decades.  I'm just happy that others can now benefit as you and I did from the talents of so great an instructor.

I think I'll post these in the "Library" subforum also, since I think it fits there.

What's wrong with inviting a rabbi in to speak?  If we're fighting some enemy, it's good to know the mind of said enemy, no?  I see no problem with that.  If any seminarians are so weak-minded as to somehow be corrupted by anything a rabbi might say, then they probably don't belong there and were destined to be corrupted anyway.

Now, the next step in fixing up these lectures is that I'm starting to convert them to stereo ... a bit more work than just automatically cleaning them up, and I'm also listening for where a bit more noise cleanup might be in order, since the first pass didn't catch them all.

No, I wasn't there, but if you're so weak-minded as to be influenced at all about a rabbi, then you have problems.

   
You were not taught well. You were raised Catholic, went to a traditional seminary, and yet show a constant naivete about Judaizers and cryptos. You were not formed well. Part of this, I'd think, would have to do with Bishop Williamson himself having had a defective formation, which is why he saw nothing odd in inviting a rabbi to speak to seminarians. He was also a fan of Valtorta, and took that nut DawnMarie seriously. I like Bishop Williamson's good qualities, but he had some defects.

One does not need to speak with a iw directly to know what they're about. Actually it's worthless to speak to them directly, for they will conceal teachings of Judaism that they know will not be palatable to gentiles. In fact they're taught that it is a virtue to deceive gentiles. Historically Popes have warned Catholics to have no dealings with iws.

The fact that you are so constantly fooled by Judaizers and cryptos is a sign that you're not playing with a full Catholic deck. You don't even qualify as a decent pagan. Any decent pagan would immediately see through people like Barnhardt.

Jesus taught us to be as wise as serpents. You're gullible. Always have been, as long as I've been skimming your (usually) boring posts on this forum. If I took a dive into your archive I've little doubt I'd find a good number of other obvious Judaizers and cryptos who have fooled you.

Do you still think Nostradamus is legit?

https://www.cathinfo.com/fighting-errors-in-the-modern-world/nostradamus-60184/