I have to ask....are you now a supporter of R&R? If so, that's good to hear.
Nonsense. Evidently you can't make the distinction between having a great respect for someone and having disagreements with him on certain issues. I disagree with Bishop Williamson on aspects of his ecclesiology, his soteriology, as well as his opinions regarding Garabandal, Valtorta, and the NOM conferring grace. In fact, I disagree with the vast majority of SVs on the ecclesiology and soteriology also ... though few of them promote Garabandal and Valtorta.
WM Review also made the same distinction, where he too points out that he doesn't agree with +Williamson about everything, but still continue to have great respect for him, and the bulk of his teaching.
As far as "R&R", Bishop Williamson has stated that the SV conclusion is possible and not unreasonable, and Father Chazal's position is impeccable from the standpoint of Catholic principles. In other words, +Williamson isn't deranged about SVism (neither was +Lefebvre) where, like you, he would get triggered and begin foaming at the mouth at the mere mention of it.