Aren't you aware that Jєωs call Arabs αnтι-ѕємιтєs as it is? And there are already plenty of Arab Catholics. The conversion of huge numbers of them to Catholicism won't keep them from being called αnтι-ѕємιтєs.
No, Numbers do often have a tendency to cause someone to curtail their boldness at times. I think a vast sea of Catholics of Arab descent, heck they could be named the "Semitic Church" if they enter en masse.
Being against an Englishman's Anglicanism is good, but being against an Englishman for being an Englishman is bad, because the Englishman could be good. The Jєω can't be good unless he ceases to be a Jєω. He's not like the Englishman, because the Jєω wouldn't call himself a Jєω if he weren't a product or disciple of the тαℓмυd,
No. That's not true. Plenty of Jєωs do not follow or even know the тαℓмυd who say they are Jєωιѕн.
whereas an Englishman can be an Englishman without being an Anglican. The ethnic identity of the Jєω is tied to the тαℓмυd, so even if he calls himself a "Jєωιѕн atheist" he is still as much a Jєω as Maimonides.
We're not talking about the "Ethnic Identity" we are talking about the ethnicity itself. I know people who were adopted who do not know their ethnic origins. A guy told me, I could be Greek, Italian or Jєωιѕн or something else, I don't know. The ethnic identity of the Irish was pagan at one time. They didn't cease to be Irish because they became Catholic.
The difference between Catholics and racialists is that Catholics believe that a Jєω can choose not to be a Jєω.
If he converts from Judaism to Catholicism, he's a Catholic who is Jєωιѕн or Hebrew or however they phrase their ethnicity. They might say American as well.
The racialist believes that a Jєω has to have his particular spiritual qualities, that they result from his genes. Ironically Jєωs and racialists are on the same page, in this regard. Which makes sense. Judaism is a racial supremacist religion that teaches that gentiles are genetically inferior to Jєωs. To be a Jєω requires that you have a Jєωιѕн mother, so it's an identity based on blood kinship and not spirit kinship. It's odd that we're supposed to think nαzιs are evil for being racial supremacists but think Jєωs are good.
Judaism in its different strains some of which have a racialist element to them, but that's a religious and cultural belief. It's not necessary for any ethnically Jєωιѕн person to buy into the premise. The religion doesn't own the race. And the race certainly doesn't own the religion since there are non-Jєωιѕн converts to Judaism going on all the time.
A Jєω should be held in contempt purely for being a Jєω.
No. That's kind of a poisoned offshoot of Catholic thinking more in line with Lutheranism actually. No person should be held in contempt because all people are created by God in His image and Likeness. You are suppose to hold erroneous ideas in contempt because they keep those souls away from attaining Heaven.
For him to remove the curse God placed on his head requires that he destroy his Jєωιѕнness.
No. He has to renounce his Judaism, not destroy his Jєωιѕнness. You don't seem to see how many rituals and symbols of Catholicism are from the Jєωιѕнness of the early Church. Everything that was in Judaism prior to the тαℓмυd was the one, true religion. Christ fulfilled that religion and made it new, with the Church as the new Israel, but you can still recognize the Jєωιѕн elements in the Church. If anything that should be a great attraction for a practicing Jєω of good will and those that see it, convert.
Topic: Bishop Williamson quote about Jєωs (Read 15438 times)