Good explanation from Bp. Williamson regarding it being clear that Bp. Fellay doesn't know his enemy.
I like the commentary on how it's a great mistake to think that there is no faith left in the Novus Ordo church.
He describes at length the problem with Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ controlling Rome, and that the masons will also destroy the Society [if reconciled].
I wish that the Bishop would have provided the name of the book that he described, as written by a Novus Ordo priest who definitely has the faith.
What strikes me in particular about the sermon is that Bp. Williamson is quite charitable in his criticisms of Bp. Fellay. This was not the case with Bp. Fellay's attitude toward Bp. Williamson in Bp. Fellay's latest interview. It was quite sad to see the animosity toward Bp. Williamson.

This is a man who has his finger on the pulse of the SSPX and the Church as a whole. God save the Bishop!

The book is "The Horror of the Profanation of the Most Holy Eucharist" by Mark Kreis and be purchased from Xulon Press or Amazon. Hope this helps!

Thanks for the info. I'll look it up.

Quote from: Wessex

I was hearing about the freemasons as a boy and my parents talked about them at length but no names seemed to crop up and one could be excused for thinking that they were one of the Church's classic bogeymen to scare the untutored, children and horses. To the extent that the Church we are also told has been riddled with them throughout history, the impression is that they take the form of some malevolent mist that descends on otherwise pious folk during their weak moments and carries them away to worship some other deity. If such an evil entity is attacking the very vitals of the Church and the SSPX, cannot the bishop name them so that we can mobilise and go and kill its leaders, wives, mistresses, servants, dogs and slaves? Or must they remain as some undefined agency of fear      immune from attack because of their useful place in a very familiar strategy? Very much how the devil is depicted.

Indeed, that vague and everpresent Masonic rumbling in the clouds, but speaking of knowing that enemy, how about their foils, the conciliar popes who are not just mush minded hapless and ignorant clerics, but have been the enemies of the Church and the Catholic Religion, and to whom the Society has always bent the knee.
Acknowledging the enemy has always been a problem for them.
Being a moderate rebel is a dicey business.

Did you view the video?

Nevermind, found it....

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGcr24n8fJo[/youtube]

Very Inspiring, thought provoking and courageous sermon. Pray for His Excellency Bishop Williamson.  

Thank you for posting.

Wessex - it is preferred to simply name the errors.  Because, blessed are they who believe without seeing, as our Lord says.  We do not need to see what goes on behind the closed doors of the lodge.  We do not need to see what goes on in the ghetto.   And, +Williamson does a great job at that.  Not a sermon of his goes by without him repeating for us the church's teaching about objective truth/non contradiction(2+2 =4 and it does not =5).  And, this strikes a deathblow to modernism.  He also mentioned nfp in one of these recent usa sermons, commending those who practice their marriage right where it is not unlikely children are to occur.  Although, I would prefer that he were more direct concerning it, because I don't believe I have ever heard him speak directly about the NFP controversy.  And, Rome has a new teaching on NFP.  NFP is the temptation of the flesh taught by the new church.  

I think the bishop likes his US audiences; the British ones ask too many questions!

Not seeing and relying on fallen clerics is the road to disillusion. Not a good formula. This masonic script is old hat. Has the SSPX ever told Rome to clean out her dirty stables; stables it now wishes to occupy? The bishop does a great job in turning a great problem into a great mythology. And so he becomes part of the problem. The people of today want more than vague generalities.

The bishop does indeed repeat that the new church is a mass of contradiction. But her intention is to build a church that embraces conflicting ideas in the name of inclusion. This is being true to the underlying objectives of the Council. I see more consistency here than in the bewildering amount of tortuous reasoning and positioning that continues to plague  traditionalists. Their leaders for their own reasons prefer the convenience of fog to the boldness of clarity.