Author Topic: Bishop Williamson in Toronto - The Conference !!! (Read 6181 times)

trento · « **Reply #10 on:** December 21, 2012, 11:13:50 AM »

Looks like there are some persistent sedevacantists (during the Q&A session) trying to prod His Excellency into sedevacantism.

SeanJohnson · « **Reply #11 on:** December 21, 2012, 11:37:19 AM »

Quote from: trento

Looks like there are some persistent sedevacantists (during the Q&A session) trying to prod His Excellency into sedevacantism.

I noticed that as well.

Didn't want to derail this thread by getting into it here, so I started another thread titled "Bishop Williamson's Distinction for the Sedes" to discuss the strengths/weaknesses (if any) of His Excellency's response.

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #12 on:** December 22, 2012, 02:33:30 PM »

Quote from: Seraphim

Quote from: trento
Looks like there are some persistent sedevacantists (during the Q&A session) trying to prod His Excellency into sedevacantism.

I noticed that as well.

Didn't want to derail this thread by getting into it here, so I started another thread titled "Bishop Williamson's Distinction for the Sedes" to discuss the strengths/weaknesses (if any) of His Excellency's response.

A wise move, Seraphim. It demonstrates that you have listened well to
the Conference and have followed +W's lead by giving meet
acknowledgement to the issue, but, unlike +W's prerogative under the
constraints of the situation, whereby he did not want to derail the topic
of the Conference by delving into a "side issue" really, here, you have
the option of opening a new thread to cover the topic at length. You even
gave it it's proper title.

Good job!

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #13 on:** December 22, 2012, 06:35:43 PM »

Quote from: Seraphim

I started another thread titled "Bishop Williamson's Distinction for the Sedes" to discuss the strengths/weaknesses (if any) of His Excellency's response.

Link is to the top of page 8 of thread.

So long as there are 5 posts per page, that is! (You never know!)

Quote from: trento

Looks like there are some persistent sedevacantists (during the Q&A session) trying to prod His Excellency into sedevacantism.

I can hardly blame the sedes for showing up, with all the publicity the
Menzingen-denizens have been foisting upon the good name of +W in
the wake of their shenanigans. It may take a while for the dust to settle,
but this specter is going to do some serious haunting in the next few
months, IMHO. It may turn into +W's greatest cross. Fortunately, the
ones at this conference were not impolite. But it could get that way,
especially if the M-d's find a way to instigate such behavior, and you
know they would not be beyond that kind of foul play.

Maria Elizabeth · « **Reply #14 on:** December 25, 2012, 07:14:32 PM »

Bumping for Geremia and others who might not have seen this thread.