Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Bishop Williamson in Brazil  (Read 8816 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline AntiFellayism

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 233
  • Reputation: +799/-0
  • Gender: Male
Bishop Williamson in Brazil
« on: September 05, 2012, 12:27:47 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • HONOR AND GLORY TO BP. WILLIAMSON
    Dom Thomas Aquinas
    September 3, Feast of St. Pius X

    In this dramatic moment in the life of the Holy Church, moment in which the Faith is most gravely threatened, an episcopal voice rises and confirms the faithful in the faith of their Baptism. Whose is this voice but of the bishop persecuted, slandered, accused of rebellion, etc., etc., etc.? And why is he persecuted, slandered, accused? Precisely because he defends the Faith and this crime has no forgiveness in the modern world. The modern world accepts everything; it even accepts the Tradition, as long as the Tradition accepts the modern world. The modern world is a highly concentrated solvent. It accepts everything it can dissolve, except the indissoluble Catholic Faith, except the integral, pure and immaculate Catholic doctrine, and this is what is at stake in this dramatic moment for the Tradition. Are we going to divide the Faith as Solomon proposed the two women vying for a child? The modernist Rome says: "Yes, let's divide the Faith, let's do a bargain. Why not?" Bishop Williamson says: " No, non possumus", and we are with him: "Non possumus!". Like Saint Peter we say to the Pharisees: "We cannot stop preaching in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ! Judge yourselves whether it is better to obey God than men." The child must live, as in the judgment of Solomon. In the present case, it is not the child who should live, but the mother, Our Mother the Holy Church. To divide Her by giving a piece to the modernists and a piece the traditionalists? Never!

    For all these reasons we say and proclaim: "Honor and glory to Bishop Williamson and to all the priests who defend the faith without compromise with the enemies of the Catholic Faith." Some may be scandalized by the mere fact of speaking about enemies in this terrible battle. If this is your case, dear reader, remember that the Church here on earth is called militant, because it militates against three cruel enemies, as states the Catechism of the Council of Trent, which are the devil, the world and the flesh. Also remember the prayer: "By the sign of the Holy Cross, deliver us, from our enemies, O Lord our God." Remember also what says St. Pius X, who we celebrate today. The enemies of the Church are currently in the veins of the same Church.

    These enemies are in Rome, unfortunately, this Rome who wants to make a deal with the Tradition, i.e., the Rome modernist which wants to make a deal with the eternal Rome. To what end? Even if it is not known the intention of the heart of Benedict XVI, it is not difficult to know how all this will end if this agreement (whose bitter fruits are already being felt, even before completion) takes place. The fruit, which already can be seen, is the silence of the Tradition, but as St. Gregory the Great said: "The Church would rather die than be silent." Then She, the real mother, won't shut up, will not do this shameful agreement, but will continue to speak, preach and work for the salvation of their children. This is what the brave priests are doing, this is what is doing Bp. Williamson. For this reason we say: "Honor and glory to Bp. Williamson, successor of the apostles and confessor of the Faith"

    Honor and glory to the Bishop who administered 99 confirmations in eight days and directed his apostolic word 15 times to different audiences, which together represent more than 300 people in this vast Brazil, evangelized by the Portuguese and now by a Bishop of the former "island of saints".

    Our monastery of Santa Cruz and the faithful of Rio, Salvador, Vitoria, Campo Grande (where a connection delay prevented the departure of Bp. Williamson), Maringá and Nova Friburgo thank the solicitude of a true Archbishop Lefebvre's son, faithful to his teachings , who came in to confirm, not only with the sacrament, but also with his deep understanding of revealed doctrine, of the modern errors and of medicine for today's illness, among which stands out with a special glow the Holy Rosary, which Bp. Williamson recommends to pray complete every day. May the Virgin Mary obtain us the grace to watch and pray to avoid falling into the temptation of agreements and to defeat the infernal serpent that wants to destroy the Tradition.

    English version seen here:
    http://cathinfo-warning-pornography!/Ignis_Ardens/index.php?s=830a28e0677009addd74c02fba9cf7fe&showtopic=10756

    Spanish can be seen here:
    http://nonpossummus.foroactivo.mx/t180-honor-y-gloria-a-monsenor-williamson-por-dom-tomas-de-aquino

    And Portuguese here:
    http://spessantotomas.blogspot.com/2012/09/honra-e-gloria-dom-williamson.html

    Non Habemus Papam


    Offline Domitilla

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 479
    • Reputation: +1009/-29
    • Gender: Male
    Bishop Williamson in Brazil
    « Reply #1 on: September 05, 2012, 01:30:52 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Thank you, AntiFellayism, for posting this beautiful letter from Dom Thomas Aquinas.  St. Pius X, please pray for us!  Godspeed, Bishop Williamson ...


    Offline Zorayda

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 110
    • Reputation: +515/-0
    • Gender: Female
    Bishop Williamson in Brazil
    « Reply #2 on: September 05, 2012, 01:33:51 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Awesome! A militant and holy monk! A militant & fierce bishop! :applause:

    Offline John McFarland

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 100
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Bishop Williamson in Brazil
    « Reply #3 on: September 07, 2012, 11:22:38 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I was just rereading the famous August 2011 leaked letter from Bishop Fellay to Bishop Williamson.  Back then I found it hard to believe all the things that Bishop Fellay said about his confrere.  Someone must be slandering him, I thought.

    All that seems a long time ago, as I read you praising him to the skies for being exactly what Bp. Fellay accused him of being.  He, the old adversary of Fr. Cekada, is now just as contemptuous of the Society as his old adversary.  He, the old adversary of Bishop Rifan, is nearly as much of an angler as that old adversary.  He, the great adversary of liberalism, is now the apostle of doing what he pleases when, where and as he pleases, all the time insisting that it was exactly what Abp. Lefebvre always counseled and would have done if he were here.  One inevitably recalls Martin Luther and sola scriptura.

    So now he has perhaps added to his following some part of the 300 people who heard him speak in Brazil.  In the U.S. he has the folks on this and similar sites and some additional sympathizers.  He was curiously absent from the August 10 declaration that caused my family to leave Fr. Ringrose and St. Athanasius, and Father seems not to have uttered a squeak about him in public.  Not many people have left St. Athanasius, but then not many people have left their SSPX chapels.  Meanwhile, no other "indy" priests have rallied to the Williamsonian standard, nor any SSPX priests except those who signed the August 10 declaration, all three of them, one of whom seems to be having second thoughts.  Fr. Pfeiffer didn't exactly knock 'em dead in St. Mary's.  This all seems to be going nowhere fast, and will go slower yet as all but the stubbornest are forced to admit that there will be no sellout, since Rome wants Vatican II and the Society is having none of it.  If Bp. Fellay's strategy is to let it all burn itself out before he gives +W once more chance and then sacks them, it seems to be working.

    It's also worth noting that Bp. Williamson has not exactly run with the battle flag to the front of the column in order to lead the troops forward.  Unlike the revered Abp. Lefebvre, his activity has been largely with his mouth and pen.  Perhaps he doesn't want to part with those digs in Wimbledon that, amazingly enough, he still occupies.  Perhaps he senses that other than St. Athanasius and Nova Fribourga, there probably won't be much work for a vagus bishop, and of course he's no kid.

     

     

    Offline Maria Elizabeth

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 186
    • Reputation: +326/-0
    • Gender: Female
    Bishop Williamson in Brazil
    « Reply #4 on: September 08, 2012, 12:50:44 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: John McFarland
    I was just rereading the famous August 2011 leaked letter from Bishop Fellay to Bishop Williamson.  Back then I found it hard to believe all the things that Bishop Fellay said about his confrere.  Someone must be slandering him, I thought.

    All that seems a long time ago, as I read you praising him to the skies for being exactly what Bp. Fellay accused him of being.  He, the old adversary of Fr. Cekada, is now just as contemptuous of the Society as his old adversary.  He, the old adversary of Bishop Rifan, is nearly as much of an angler as that old adversary.  He, the great adversary of liberalism, is now the apostle of doing what he pleases when, where and as he pleases, all the time insisting that it was exactly what Abp. Lefebvre always counseled and would have done if he were here.  One inevitably recalls Martin Luther and sola scriptura.

    So now he has perhaps added to his following some part of the 300 people who heard him speak in Brazil.  In the U.S. he has the folks on this and similar sites and some additional sympathizers.  He was curiously absent from the August 10 declaration that caused my family to leave Fr. Ringrose and St. Athanasius, and Father seems not to have uttered a squeak about him in public.  Not many people have left St. Athanasius, but then not many people have left their SSPX chapels.  Meanwhile, no other "indy" priests have rallied to the Williamsonian standard, nor any SSPX priests except those who signed the August 10 declaration, all three of them, one of whom seems to be having second thoughts.  Fr. Pfeiffer didn't exactly knock 'em dead in St. Mary's.  This all seems to be going nowhere fast, and will go slower yet as all but the stubbornest are forced to admit that there will be no sellout, since Rome wants Vatican II and the Society is having none of it.  If Bp. Fellay's strategy is to let it all burn itself out before he gives +W once more chance and then sacks them, it seems to be working.

    It's also worth noting that Bp. Williamson has not exactly run with the battle flag to the front of the column in order to lead the troops forward.  Unlike the revered Abp. Lefebvre, his activity has been largely with his mouth and pen.  Perhaps he doesn't want to part with those digs in Wimbledon that, amazingly enough, he still occupies.  Perhaps he senses that other than St. Athanasius and Nova Fribourga, there probably won't be much work for a vagus bishop, and of course he's no kid.

     


    Talk about SLANDER...  Where's the Catholic charity in all this "high and mighty" speech?  

    God and the Faith are worth ANYTHING:  Reputation, Friends, Life, EVERYTHING!  It doesn't matter who goes along.  Those who keep the Faith are the true Crusaders for Our Lord.

    Archbishop Lefebvre was the most recent role model for Crusader, and one whom we've come to know and love.  Bishop Fellay is betraying his vision ... and betraying Holy Mother Church ... because Archbishop Lefebvre was a VERY holy bishop, raised up by God to help us in these horrible times.

    Bishop Fellay does NOT care about souls.  He SHRUGS off the fact that, in those diosese where the bishops are hostile to tradition, souls will be left without pastors or the sacraments WHEN Bishop Fellay is able to give the SSPX chapels to modernist Rome.

    "The salvation of souls is the highest law."  Those who resist Bishop Fellay's subversion (his blatent disregard for souls) are the true Crusaders for Christ.  THEY are the ones who will be rewarded in heaven, even if they never see ANY reward in this life.... even if they are the very last ones to fight for souls.  

    Souls are VERY precious!





    Offline Seramic

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 2
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Bishop Williamson in Brazil
    « Reply #5 on: September 08, 2012, 12:52:05 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The same old double standards. A post like that regarding bishop Fellay would have earned the indignation of many here.

    Now the Williamsonites have come out to proclaim the cult of man as they look to their 'superhero' to save their them ! O if only I could be with my superhero  :dancing:

    Offline Zorayda

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 110
    • Reputation: +515/-0
    • Gender: Female
    Bishop Williamson in Brazil
    « Reply #6 on: September 08, 2012, 01:07:03 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • No Mr. McFarland. You left St. Athanasius because you've been corrected. LOL! God bless Fr. Ringrose & Dr. White.

    Offline Incredulous

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8901
    • Reputation: +8675/-849
    • Gender: Male
    Bishop Williamson in Brazil
    « Reply #7 on: September 08, 2012, 01:24:36 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Father Rostand unleashes the aging American pit-bull, John McFarland, who... "weel bite zee evil sedes!"

    "Some preachers will keep silence about the truth, and others will trample it underfoot and deny it. Sanctity of life will be held in derision even by those who outwardly profess it, for in those days Our Lord Jesus Christ will send them not a true Pastor but a destroyer."  St. Francis of Assisi


    Offline Ethelred

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1222
    • Reputation: +2267/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Bishop Williamson in Brazil
    « Reply #8 on: September 08, 2012, 04:35:05 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • It's a pity that the good Bishop had to stay away from the houses of the SSPX, but it's logical because we're seeing the final battle for the SSPX.

    However, here's some nice pictures from Don Thomas Aquinas' website.

    Offline Ethelred

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1222
    • Reputation: +2267/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Bishop Williamson in Brazil
    « Reply #9 on: September 08, 2012, 04:36:43 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I could also post them here, but they're wide...

    Offline Ethelred

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1222
    • Reputation: +2267/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Bishop Williamson in Brazil
    « Reply #10 on: September 08, 2012, 04:37:32 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • OK, new page now, here they are:
















    Offline Francisco

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1150
    • Reputation: +843/-18
    • Gender: Male
    Bishop Williamson in Brazil
    « Reply #11 on: September 08, 2012, 06:40:31 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Some years ago I believe it was Patrick H. Omlor who criticized the SSPX for behaving as though the Vatican II Church was merely the naughty branch of the True Church! Thank Heavens we have Bishop Williamson as an exception to this (mis)behaviour!

    Offline SJB

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5171
    • Reputation: +1932/-17
    • Gender: Male
    Bishop Williamson in Brazil
    « Reply #12 on: September 08, 2012, 08:05:10 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: John McFarland
    All that seems a long time ago, as I read you praising him to the skies for being exactly what Bp. Fellay accused him of being.  He, the old adversary of Fr. Cekada, is now just as contemptuous of the Society as his old adversary.  He, the old adversary of Bishop Rifan, is nearly as much of an angler as that old adversary.  He, the great adversary of liberalism, is now the apostle of doing what he pleases when, where and as he pleases, all the time insisting that it was exactly what Abp. Lefebvre always counseled and would have done if he were here.  One inevitably recalls Martin Luther and sola scriptura.


    So you compare the most recent crisis in the SSPX with both the 1983 "split" of the nine and the the Protestant revolt. The latter really needs no comment, while with the former, a strained comparison is about all that can be made.

    It seems that as it is more likely Bp. Williamson may be headed out of the SSPX, criticism of him by the "virtuous" now becomes virtuous.

    It would be comparatively easy for us to be holy if only we could always see the character of our neighbours either in soft shade or with the kindly deceits of moonlight upon them. Of course, we are not to grow blind to evil

    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    Bishop Williamson in Brazil
    « Reply #13 on: September 08, 2012, 12:13:33 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This latent animosity of the Fellayites is unbecoming of true Society members.

    If they were honest, they would just leave. But instead, they dig in and dish out
    the venom. Things can get a lot worse...............
    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.

    Offline John McFarland

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 100
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Bishop Williamson in Brazil
    « Reply #14 on: September 08, 2012, 12:44:47 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Incredulous,

    I am not the tool of that cheese-eating surrender monkey with the funny accent, Little Judas Rostand.  He and I haven't spoken since I chatted amiably at Winona a few years back with him and Other Little Judas Le Roux; nor has he deputized any of the Littler Judases of the Society to give me my marching orders, although they have suggested that I tone it down a bit, and even cut it out.  

    Furthermore, I am not ag(e)ing.  I am aged.

    Nonetheless, I seem still to have enough on my fastball that you'd sooner fire insults than reasoned refutations my way.