Here is the response from Non Possumus website, please go to the site to see the photo which sums up everything!
https://www.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fnonpossumus-vcr.blogspot.com%2F&langpair=es%7Cen&en=es&en=UTF8I would like to focus on some of the bishop's comments.
First:
"I am convinced that under present circuмstances Monsignor Lefebvre would accept without hesitation the canonical proposal of a personal prelature."
"The 1988 episcopal ordinations did them because in conscience he thought he should do it, as an extreme act, that he suffered, and for that reason he said that this situation should not take long."
These statements are an insult to the Archbishop. Bishop Schneider simply does not know the man on whose behalf he claims to speak.
Nonsense! The Archbishop did nothing "extreme" in consecrating four bishops.
It seems necessary to remind our readers that when asked if he had any "doubts" or "remorse" for what he did, Archbishop Lefebvre. Responded by saying : "No, not at all. I think everything that happened was raised in a truly providential and almost miraculous way. " "I think, therefore, that there should be no hesitation or scruples about episcopal consecrations."
Monsignor Schneider's comment that Monsignor Lefebvre "said that this situation would not last long" also deserves scrutiny. And his statement that "If a long time remains canonically autonomous, enter at risk of losing a typically Catholic feature, which is subject to the Pope".
The Archbishop did not believe any of these things. In fact, the opposite said in 1990:
We should not have any illusions. We are fighting a battle supported by a whole line of potatoes. Therefore, we should not hesitate or fear, doubts such as: "Why should we remain on our own? After all, why not join Rome, why not join the pope? "Yes, if Rome and the Pope were aligned in the Tradition, if they were carrying out the work of all the Popes of the 19th century and first half Of the 20th century, of course. Then we should not worry. We must first of all trust in the grace of God.
What is going to happen? When will all this end? That is a secret of God. A mystery, but we must fight against the ideas currently fashionable in Rome, which come from the mouth of the Pope, the mouth of Cardinal Ratzinger, Cardinal Casaroli, Cardinal Willebrands and those who are like them. It is clear, because all they do is repeat the opposite of what the popes have said and solemnly established for the last 150 years. It is clear, therefore, we should not hesitate for a moment.
Monsignor Lefebvre believed that "we should not worry" about not being with those who betray the Tradition. We must "trust the grace of God" and "fight against the ideas currently fashionable in Rome" for as long as they persist. We should not "hesitate for a moment" because it is a "secret of God" how everything will end.
Monsignor Lefebvre would also disagree with the belief that being "autonomous for a long time" carries "the risk of losing a characteristic of the Catholic Church."
It should be noted that in 2003 Father Jean Violette, then District Superior of Canada, condemned Fr. Aulagnier, a priest of the Fraternity at that time, because he believed that there was a danger of not being "canonically regularized" by Rome . Read the letter P. Violette here .
. Two quotes over Mons Schneider deserve attention:
"I have a great desire that the SSPX be recognized and established as soon as possible in the normal structure of the Church, and that would be for the benefit of all, for them and for us. It would really be a new force in this great battle for the purity of the Faith "
"I told Monsignor Fellay: Monsignor, we need your presence to go together with all the good forces of the Church, to have that union"
While it is heartening that Bishop Schneider frequently talks about Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ, modernism and many other evils that affect the Church today, he is the one who needs to return to full communion with Tradition and all the Popes of the past. Moreover, his "great desire" should not be that Rome regularize the Fraternity. It should be that modernist Rome repents of its blasphemous ways and reestablishes itself within the regular structure of Eternal Rome.
The Bishop's observations about "joining forces" demonstrate a kind of naturalistic thinking that minimizes the supernatural battle. In fact, if, as Bishop Schneider says, traditionalists will be better able to bring about change once the SSPX is "regularized", then the modernists are dumber than they seem. Honestly, would Pope Francis really take steps that would enable his theological enemies to coordinate in such a way that ultimately would lead to the disappearance not only of progressive Catholicism but possibly of Vatican II? He and his liberal allies are not so naive.
Monsignor Lefebvre said that there are "certain faithful, who are very good people, who accepted the consecrations but who have a repentance in the deep: they are no longer with the people who used to be, people who did not accept the consecrations, which are now in Our against "Of these people, the Archbishop said:" Are they going to join us and work with us "? Or are they going to "take a different path to keep the company of liberals left us?" Mons. Schneider, as the leaders of the SSPX, they need to decide. Are they going to join the Archbishop or go another way? I know who I am. And you?