Why is OnePeterFive publishing exclusives like this when they're really just a Motu-ish (at best) operation who have never been friendly to True Traditional Catholics (the non-Motarians)?

All in all, a pretty good article. I'm surprised to see it posted on the dreadful OnePeterFive blog though. 

I skimmed the OnePeterFive article and the author maintains that Bp. Williamson was not booted from the SSPX over the h0Ɩ0cαųst issue.  I completely disagree.  I drove Bp. Williamson to the airport back in 1994 and told him, "Well my Lord, the great Luciferian commandment is, 'Thou shalt not deny the h0Ɩ0cαųst.'"  He smiled.  I am sure that in his mind he figured that he would get booted from the SSPX over the h0Ɩ0cαųst issue.  I am surprised it did not happen much sooner to be honest.

100% he was booted over the h0Ɩ0cαųst, and the author of this article just accepted the SSPX official story, which was about as believable as the Building 7 narrative.  SSPX cited "disobedience", but, uhm, disobedience about what?  Had Bishop Williamson engaged in any other form of "disobedience", such as refusing to take some assignment, there's no way they'd have expelled him.  That's to say nothing of how Bishop Williamson ever owed obedience to anyone else in SSPX, and the hypocrisy of constantly basing your existence on "faith is greater than obedience", disobeying the putative "Vicar of Christ", but then punishing someone else for disobeying someone with zero jurisdiction to follow their own conscience.  I guess the maxim should be, "Fellay's faith is greater than obedience, but not Williamson's."

The main reason +Williamson was booted was because he exposed the nefarious reconciliation plan that Felley was making with the fake church.

I thought, too, that the main reason that +W was kicked out of the SSPX was his opposition to the SSPX reconciliation with Modernist Rome. He indicated as such himself, if I recall correctly, but I can't recall how he provided this info. The h0Ɩ0h0αx narrative was just a convenient cover story as to why the SSPX kicked him out.

Though +W did not refer to the conciliar church as the fake church. He still believed, as did +ABL, that the Church is occupied by a Modernist sect. Not completely fake, as it still retains a semblance of Catholicism.

From Cathobel  Google translate

"...
Monsignor Galaretta sided with authority

But on 13 October, Bishop Alfonso de Galarreta, hitherto known as a rather partisan of Bishop Williamson, gave a lecture in France which was radically taking "the opposite of his English colleague to justify the policy of the General House", says Michel Janva (on the site "Le Salon Beige". Monsignor de Galarreta has in fact envisaged the normalisation of the SSPX without requiring Rome to return entirely to traditional standards. According to Michel Janva, this conference marked "the cautious and discreet tightening of the proposals made in Rome by the Argentine bishop, who seems to have been the spokesman of his superior on this occasion and who took the opportunity to distance himself from the very radical and no less original Bishop Williamson".