What I don't see is people disagreeing with the hypothesis. Silence is a form of consent, giving the impression that most people agree with the hypothesis.
Fr. Pfeiffer has several issues. His sloppy liturgy doesn't reflect well on him and suggests poor discipline. He looks very sleep-deprived to me, which could either cause or be caused by the overweight. His agitation and the way he stumbles through words are like people I know hopped up on caffeine. He probably has a poor diet, likely eating fast food when traveling.
But jumping to "possible" possession based on some long-standing tic strikes me as nutty.
He was a priest by 2002. If he had these tics in the seminary, he's had them since 25 years ago - when he was a young man.
Stanely,
Very early in Fr. Pfeiffer’s priesthood, he became closely associated with his sidekick “Pablo”.
They we’re together in Phoenix, Colorado and now Kentucky.
Even if Pablo were a devout Catholic, this close affiliation between a priest and a layman is abnormal.
Prior to that, Pablo ran a fake exorcist scam for years in Phoenix. It is well docuмented.
Thirdly, much testimony of Pablo’s occult activities has been docuмented on this forum.
If you go to Cathinfo’s SSPX Resistance” topic:? “Bishup Pfeiffer and his Santeria warlock”,
You’ll see a post where Father Amorph cites that demonic possession includes subjugation & dependence.
This is the abnormal condition for Fr. Pfeiffer’s priesthood.
Since 2012, Pfeiffer/Pablo have been running a trad chapel franchise network both in the States and in Asia.
Now that Fr. Pfeiffer claims to be a Bishop, they will attempt to ordain priests and expand their $business.