Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13 14 ... 30

Author Topic: Bishop Pfeiffer  (Read 30754 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SeanJohnson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15064
  • Reputation: +9980/-3161
  • Gender: Male
Re: Bishop Pfeiffer
« Reply #165 on: July 31, 2020, 06:50:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
    • Quote from: Quo vadis Domine on July 31, 2020, 06:43:43 PM
    Hearsay is not proof. Show the proof or retract.
    No need; his supporters consent to the claim that he withheld intention at Palmar.
    Logged
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15064
    • Reputation: +9980/-3161
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Bishop Pfeiffer
    « Reply #166 on: July 31, 2020, 06:56:11 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!2
    • Quote from: Quo vadis Domine on July 31, 2020, 06:54:18 PM
    Sean you’re better than that. That is completely disingenuous.

    Ahem..."I'm better than" accepting what Thuc advocates accept?

    A frivolous post devoid of content.

    You should be challenging your fellow schismatic, Clemens Maria.

    After all, he introduced the Palmarian fraud, not me.
    Logged
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15064
    • Reputation: +9980/-3161
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Bishop Pfeiffer
    « Reply #167 on: July 31, 2020, 06:59:37 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Quo vadis Domine on July 31, 2020, 06:58:51 PM
    I completely misjudged your character. Mea culpa.
    Apology accepted.
    Logged
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15064
    • Reputation: +9980/-3161
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Bishop Pfeiffer
    « Reply #168 on: July 31, 2020, 07:20:24 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
    • Quote from: Quo vadis Domine on July 31, 2020, 07:14:05 PM

    Always remember Sean that the only thing that that saves you from being in schism is the FACT that Bergoglio is NOT a true pope. If he were a true pope, your picture would be posted under the definition of the term schismatic.
    Sede-craziness.
    Logged
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15064
    • Reputation: +9980/-3161
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Bishop Pfeiffer
    « Reply #169 on: July 31, 2020, 07:21:53 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
    • Quote from: Clemens Maria on July 31, 2020, 07:17:53 PM
    It has been explained.  Read Mario Derkson’s web site defending +Thuc.  Ladislaus did a good job summarizing it.  I know you won’t read it because you don’t really care about truth.  All you care about is your team winning.  Where’s the letter Sean?  All you have is a second hand report in the 1982 Angelus.  No solid evidence that he ever admitted simulating a sacrament.  But we do have evidence after 1982 that he affirmed the validity of the 1976 consecration.

    Ahem, I should be asking YOU for the letter, since it was YOU who told the world Thuc withheld intention at Palmar.

    Idiot.

    Why are you so hostile to the Thuc'ies?

    You shouldn't be slandering the great Thuc like that, and hurting faith in sedevacantism!   :facepalm: :jester: :laugh2: :laugh1:

    YOU need to produce a letter to refute....YOURSELF!
    Logged
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline Miseremini

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3750
    • Reputation: +2792/-238
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Bishop Pfeiffer
    « Reply #170 on: July 31, 2020, 07:23:15 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Now this is photoshopped !
    Is he trying to convey his consecration is somehow linked to the four original bishops?

    Logged
    "Let God arise, and let His enemies be scattered: and them that hate Him flee from before His Holy Face"  Psalm 67:2[/b]

    Offline Quo vadis Domine

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4187
    • Reputation: +2431/-557
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Bishop Pfeiffer
    « Reply #171 on: July 31, 2020, 07:29:01 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
    • Quote from: SeanJohnson on July 31, 2020, 07:21:53 PM
    Ahem, I should be asking YOU for the letter, since it was YOU who told the world Thuc withheld intention at Palmar.

    Idiot.

    Why are you so hostile to the Thuc'ies?

    You shouldn't be slandering the great Thuc like that, and hurting faith in sedevacantism!   :facepalm: :jester: :laugh2: :laugh1:

    YOU need to produce a letter to refute....YOURSELF!
    Seriously Sean, swallow your pride and admit you are wrong. I know you can, you’ve done it in the past.
    Logged
    For what doth it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and suffer the loss of his own soul? Or what exchange shall a man give for his soul?

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15064
    • Reputation: +9980/-3161
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Bishop Pfeiffer
    « Reply #172 on: July 31, 2020, 07:30:54 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!2
    • Quote from: Quo vadis Domine on July 31, 2020, 07:29:01 PM
    Seriously Sean, swallow your pride and admit you are wrong. I know you can, you’ve done it in the past.
    Desperate attempts to salvage the sede enterprise, devoid of argument, are frivolous.
    Logged
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41859
    • Reputation: +23917/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Bishop Pfeiffer
    « Reply #173 on: July 31, 2020, 08:06:40 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: SeanJohnson on July 31, 2020, 06:41:54 PM
    Thuc admitted he faked the Palmarian consecrations; it was discussed earlier in the thread.  If you can disprove it, I would not be disappointed.

    You should know that it's nearly impossible to prove a negative.  I've never seen it proven that he said that he withheld his intention at Palmar.
    Logged

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41859
    • Reputation: +23917/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Bishop Pfeiffer
    « Reply #174 on: July 31, 2020, 08:08:38 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: SeanJohnson on July 31, 2020, 07:20:24 PM
    Sede-craziness.

    Come on, Sean.  You're degenerating this into ad hominems.  There's no need for this.
    Logged

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41859
    • Reputation: +23917/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Bishop Pfeiffer
    « Reply #175 on: July 31, 2020, 08:10:03 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Miseremini on July 31, 2020, 07:23:15 PM
    Now this is photoshopped !
    Is he trying to convey his consecration is somehow linked to the four original bishops?



    He should have Father Feeney and Archbishop Thuc in the background too.
    Logged

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15064
    • Reputation: +9980/-3161
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Bishop Pfeiffer
    « Reply #176 on: July 31, 2020, 08:29:00 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
    • Quote from: Ladislaus on July 31, 2020, 08:08:38 PM
    Come on, Sean.  You're degenerating this into ad hominems.  There's no need for this.

    C'mon, Lad.

    You know me, homie.

    Give some, get some.

    If some sede is going to come at me with some BS, I'm going to give some back.

    QVD has no business approaching me about what CLEMENS MARIA -A SEDE- introduced into the conversation.

    And then he goes on to use the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ's tactic of pretending he is on the high ground against me, by requiring of ME proof for an allegation SOMEONE ELSE -A SEDE- made.

    I'm not having that, son.

    He might score points against Poche or some rookie, but I've been around a long time.

    You gotta do better than that against me, or you're just spinning your wheels, and wasting everyone's time.
    Logged
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline duck2050

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 20
    • Reputation: +24/-4
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Bishop Pfeiffer
    « Reply #177 on: July 31, 2020, 08:57:54 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Ladislaus on July 31, 2020, 08:10:03 PM
    He should have Father Feeney and Archbishop Thuc in the background too.
    ...and Jean Laborie, Jean Pierre Danyel, Hugh George de Willmott-Newman, William Bernard Crow, Aleister Crowley, Theodor Reuss, et al. by way of Terrasson’s ordination.  
    Logged

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 31176
    • Reputation: +27093/-494
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Bishop Pfeiffer
    « Reply #178 on: July 31, 2020, 09:00:03 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
    • Gentlemen --

    Take the fight elsewhere. You're derailing the thread.

    This is not the place for pro and con Sedevacantist rhetoric.
    Logged
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com

    Offline duck2050

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 20
    • Reputation: +24/-4
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Bishop Pfeiffer
    « Reply #179 on: July 31, 2020, 09:01:28 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Pfeiffer certainly hasn’t wasted any time getting down to business!
    Logged
    Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13 14 ... 30
    « previous next »