Sean, I updated the OP.

My wife isn't as good at things like taking screenshots, so I took one and cropped it nice. I added it to the OP.

Here it is, for those who can't be bothered to scroll up to the OP.

It is my understanding that "Bishop" Webster is a sedevacantist and a Feeneyite.
.
C) double-down on the insanity, turn up the crazy to 11, do something drastic.

So, Fr Pfeiffer, one of the most outspoken, anti-feeneyite, if-you're-not-3-baptisms-you're-a-heretic priests i've ever heard of, is consecrated by (in his view) a feeneyite heretic.  Hahaha.  You can't make this stuff up.

I first saw this post from my phone this morning, and now looking at it from PC, the man to the left definitely looks like Neal Webster.
.
I am surprised that Fr. Pfeiffer would resort to Webster's services, since he (Pfeiffer) is militantly anti-Feeneyite (though for perspective, there is nothing that Pfeiffer is against that he isn't militantly against), and the only reason people know Webster's name is that he's the only traditional bishop on record who denies baptism of desire. 
.
I guess perhaps he (Pfeiffer) realized that his choices were between a doubtfully ordained liar and schismatic (Moran), any number of obscure sede bishops, MBA-grad Old-Catholic 'cardinals' (Rutherford Johnson), and a mild and infirm Feeneyite.  This sounds like a Coen brothers movie.
.
I personally labor under doubts about the validity of Webster's orders.  The docuмentation of these orders is around, and it goes through quite a few Palmarian clerics before 'emerging' out of that schismatic sect.  Some of the men along that line of orders later sought conditional ordinations/consecrations.  Plus, the Palmarians changed the rite of mass, which has always made me uneasy because it raises legitimate questions about whether or not they changed other rites (I have tried to find out specifically if they changed the rites of orders and to no avail; some people claim they have, but I have not seen any proof).
.
Anyways, I do echo Matthew's sentiment that no one should be surprised at the fact of Fr. Pfeiffer pursuing episcopal orders.  That has been in the pipe ever since he left the SSPX, I think.

The man to the right is Fr. Pancras, is it not?

Yes it's 100% him. Pablo has sermons by him posted, and it's certainly the same man.

It is my understanding that "Bishop" Webster is a sedevacantist and a Feeneyite.

I am surprised that Fr. Pfeiffer would resort to Webster's services, since he (Pfeiffer) is militantly anti-Feeneyite (though for perspective, there is nothing that Pfeiffer is against that he isn't militantly against), and the only reason people know Webster's name is that he's the only traditional bishop on record who denies baptism of desire.  

So, Fr Pfeiffer, one of the most outspoken, anti-feeneyite, if-you're-not-3-baptisms-you're-a-heretic priests i've ever heard of, is consecrated by (in his view) a feeneyite heretic.  Hahaha.  You can't make this stuff up.

.
And one of the most militantly outspoken, anti-sedevacantist, if-you-don't-believe-Francis-is-pope-you're-a-heretic priests i've ever heard of, is consecrated by (in his view) a sedevacantist heretic. 

.
And one of the most militantly outspoken, anti-sedevacantist, if-you-don't-believe-Francis-is-pope-you're-a-heretic priests i've ever heard of, is consecrated by (in his view) a sedevacantist heretic.

I don't believe Webster is a sedevacantist. 
.
If he were, that would indeed compound the irony.

The Catacombs Forum is posting this:

“Well, dear friends, it seems that Fr. Pfeiffer has been "consecrated" by the dubious "Bishop" Neal Webster.

It is my understanding that "Bishop" Webster is a sedevacantist and a Feeneyite. But of even more concern is the fact that[color=71101d] "Bishop" Webster is a Thuc line priest and bishop, placing great doubt on the validity of both his ordination and consecration, and consequently on the "consecration" of "Bishop" Pfeiffer.[/font][/size][/color]

It is rumored that there will be a video published later today from OLMC with details of this "consecration" of Fr. Pfeiffer.“

Well, now I see the resemblance.  I had not seen Bishop Webster in 30 years, so it didn't strike me at first, but, yes, that's Bishop Webster in red there.

He seems to be a very SOFT Feeneyite, since Father Pfeiffer put out some very hostile anti-Feeneyite materials before.