Now he is a "bishop" from the line of this "pope"?

https://www.elmundo.es/cronica/2005/493/1111878014.html

"Gregory XVII recognized that in his youth he fell prey to sɛҳuąƖ debauchery, and that he molested men and women attached to his sect. But that has not been an obstacle for thousands of people to remain faithful to their creed. Even after his death?"

"Clemente himself, known as 'La Voltio' in gαy circles in Franco's Seville (***he used to work at an electricity company), confessed to his acolytes a few years ago his sins of sɛҳuąƖ incontinence, in apparent reference to his molestation of nuns and bishops under his command."

Pfeiffer is marked for destruction many times over. He is the archetypal priest who forged his own calling, forged his own seminary, forged his own bishopric.

I pray for his swift removal from the face of the earth. What a disgusting spectacle. Don't anyone dare put this all on the Mexican. If God's grace were enough for Pfeiffer, he'd never have resorted to Satan's power.

I can't believe I am going to say this, but you are right on target, Croixalist.

The video linked below was recently posted. It is a still picture with several scrolling statements saying that sacraments do not depend on the faith of the minister.

I'm guessing he's being defensive that Webster is sedevacantist, but if so, the message in the video below is very strange. I don't think anyone is questioning the validity based on differences of opinion on some issues. Is something else going on here?

Even though our collective "fraternal correction" calling out Fr./Bp. Pfeiffer is actually the best form of charity called for in this situation -- he sees it differently.

Indeed.  If I had been in this situation and someone pointed out the defective form while I still had a chance to correct it, I would be most grateful.  If we really wanted to get at him, we'd save the video and then pull it out after Bishop Webster was no longer capable of fixing the problem (e.g. after incapacity or death) ... after he had performed large numbers or ordinations or confirmations.  During his sermon, he might have publicly thanked CathInfo for pointing this out to him.

Are they implying that Bishop Webster is a heretic?  How long do we give it before +?Pfeiffer is throwing Bishop Webster under the bus, publicly denouncing and excoriating him?  Nor would I feel too sorry for +Webster, since he should have researched who this man is before having consecrated him.

See my rant about Baby Boomers

If you are going to stay aloof from the Internet, you need an equally efficacious, current, and broad source of information/knowledge/intelligence about persons in the Trad world -- especially if you're a bishop and some of those persons are going to contact you seeking ordination.

Considering the distributed, isolated nature of the Trad world, it would seem to be most imprudent to neither use the Internet NOR have a group of people keeping you up-to-speed about events, which they found out about on the Internet. I know Bp. Zendejas has a large group like this. I'm sure Bp. Williamson does as well. They are always well informed about all the personages and characters in Tradition.

It's not like God doesn't hold bishops accountable for who they consecrate. If it's true that bad priests lead to apostate laymen, what does it mean for the bishop who ordained those bad priests? Wouldn't God hold him accountable? Indeed He does.

I don't know if that is really Ambrose, but you're welcome to look into it. I posted everything I have.

Does Ambrose claim some sort of jurisdiction in the matter?  Isn't he a fake bishop too?

He's a fake Arch-bishop, and perhaps thinks that gives him some power over fake just-bishops.

He's a fake Arch-bishop, and perhaps thinks that gives him some power over fake just-bishops.

I think he and Pfeiffer had a deal of some sort, hence "conditionally ordaining" Poisson at Pfeiffer's behest.
.
Moran lives in a rental house of a Pfeiffer supporter just a 3 hour drive from OLMC.
.
Wonder if Moran will excommunicate Pfeiffer now.  That would solve everything because Fr. Pfeiffer considers Moran a legitimate Archbishop.   Hence, Fr. Pfeiffer would have to cease and desist all operations.

I literally laughed out loud and spit some chuck roast across the table when reading that Ambrose Moran 1) does not accept the consecration, 2) on the grounds that it was done without HIS approval, 3)and that he thought CathInfo should know. 
.
I couldn't be more entertained by a circus. Even if the email is fake, I applaud the sense of humor.