I still want to know what the SSPX is going to do about their bishop situation. Their position grows more precarious every year.
They've really painted themselves into a corner.
If they do consecrate without a Papal mandate again (a la 1988), they will
A) be hypocrites
B) anyone in the Resistance can throw in their face how they're doing the same thing +Williamson did recently with his consecrations.
It will be difficult, nay, impossible for them to show any ways in which their "illicit" consecration is somehow fundamentally different than the consecration of +Faure, +Thomas Aquinas, +Zendejas, et. al.
C) throw away everything they've "worked for" (compromised/changed/contradicted themselves for) over the past 12+ years.