Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6

Author Topic: Bishop Fellay, Will He or Won't He Go Totally under Rome's Authority  (Read 3041 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline cosmas

Bishop Fellay, Will He or Won't He Go Totally under Rome's Authority
« on: May 26, 2020, 10:19:45 AM »
The Neo-SSPX's Bishop Tissier de Mallerais
Here Looking Wan and Seriously Ill
Is Reportedly Being Hospitalized
In a Neo-SSPX Facility
Apparently for the Rest of His Life
The Sidelining of Tissier Means
That Bernie Fellay Has only One Other Bishop
The Spaniard Alfonso de Galarreta
Fellay, Having Sold out to the "Authority"
Of Heretic Newrome and Francis-Bergoglio
Has Painted Himself into a Corner
He Is Prohibited from Consecrating Another Bishop
Word has now leaked out of Neo-Society of St. Pius X that the Neo-SSPX is now down to two bishops. Bishop Richard Williamson, formerly the Neo-SSPX's senior bishop, left Fellay in 2012, because Fellay, then Superior General, now de facto Superior General using David Pagliarani as his puppet, had a policy of selling out to heretic Newrome and its Newpopes. Now word comes from France that Bishop Bernard Tissier de Mallerais, 74, the Neo-SSPX's Gallic bishop, is being hospitalized at a Neo-SSPX facility, apparently for the rest of his life. Only the Spaniard bishop, Alfonso de Galarreta, is left with Fellay.
Fellay, 62, cannot engineer the consecration of another bishop without incurring the wrath and final excommunication from Francis-Bergoglio and his Newchurch of the New Order. So, Fellay, who still wants to join Newchurch, is stuck between Scylla and Charybdis: accept the full-blown Novus Ordo or function with only one other bishop.
One could feel sorry for the once-traditional Neo-SSPX, except that it has brought all this treachery upon itself by perfidiously working to join the heretic Newchurch since 2000. Two decades have now passed, and the NSSPXers have done nothing to eject Fellay and his henchmen from leadership in the Neo-SSPX or, better, to leave that abortive organization altogether.
Logged

Offline Banezian

Re: Bishop Fellay, Will He or Won't He Go Totally under Rome's Authority
« Reply #1 on: May 26, 2020, 12:14:44 PM »
This is stupid. Tissier is at Econe and Fellay is now at STAS
Logged

Offline SeanJohnson

Re: Bishop Fellay, Will He or Won't He Go Totally under Rome's Authority
« Reply #2 on: May 26, 2020, 12:57:56 PM »
Quote from: Banezian on May 26, 2020, 12:14:44 PM
This is stupid. Tissier is at Econe and Fellay is now at STAS

I believe the Traditio report regarding Bishop Tissier de Mallerais being "hospitalized in a Neo-SSPX facility" is based on the latest Eleison Comments of Bishop Williamson, who mentioned Bishop Tissier is now permanently convalescing in Econe.

If that is true, it means the SSPX is down to two bishops, and is now trapped into:

1) Dying on the vine;
2) Allowing Rome to hand-pick a liberal to be consecrated;
3) Consecrating without approval.

The latter option is certainly out of the question, ever since the SSPX condemned the episcopal consecration of Bishop Faure in 2015 (e.g., in Fr. Laisney's letter "Striking Contrasts," in which they condemned the consecration to ingratiate themselves to modernist Rome, thereby signalling they would never run off the leash again, and be nice little puppies, and stop all their barking, which already by that time hadn't been heard in several years).
Logged

Offline Banezian

Re: Bishop Fellay, Will He or Won't He Go Totally under Rome's Authority
« Reply #3 on: May 26, 2020, 01:29:24 PM »
Quote from: SeanJohnson on May 26, 2020, 12:57:56 PM
I believe the Traditio report regarding Bishop Tissier de Mallerais being "hospitalized in a Neo-SSPX facility" is based on the latest Eleison Comments of Bishop Williamson, who mentioned Bishop Tissier is now permanently convalescing in Econe.

If that is true, it means the SSPX is down to two bishops, and is now trapped into:

1) Dying on the vine;
2) Allowing Rome to hand-pick a liberal to be consecrated;
3) Consecrating without approval.

The latter option is certainly out of the question, ever since the SSPX condemned the episcopal consecration of Bishop Faure in 2015 (e.g., in Fr. Laisney's letter "Striking Contrasts," in which they condemned the consecration to ingratiate themselves to modernist Rome, thereby signalling they would never run off the leash again, and be nice little puppies, and stop all their barking, which already by that time hadn't been heard in several years).
I’ve had 4 SSPX priests tell me
“When we need to consecrate, we will consecrate, with or without the permission of Rome”
ABL didn’t consecrate until he was in his 80s. I’d be stunned if we don’t have new Bishops by the time the 2 younger ones are  in their 70s.  Nothing will happen under Francis( he’ll  probably be dead in 5 years) What the Society ultimately does will depend on the position of Francis’ successor. If he gives permission unconditionally, great. If not, no matter. If Modernist Rome “excommunicates” us, so be it.
Let’s wait and see what happens instead of engaging in frivolous speculation 
Logged

Offline Last Tradhican

Re: Bishop Fellay, Will He or Won't He Go Totally under Rome's Authority
« Reply #4 on: May 26, 2020, 02:15:05 PM »
Quote from: cosmas on May 26, 2020, 10:19:45 AM

Fellay, 62, 
I thought he was in his 70's. He does not look well for his age. He use to be a strong lumberjack type when I met him in the late 90's. Does he have health issues? 
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6
« previous next »