When I was in the seminary, a few years ago now, I can remember a talk given to us by a Priest or Bishop of the SSPX ,not too sure who, about the signs that lead to a priest leaving the SSPX. He said it starts of small and then grows. Example he might not read some of his brievery or maybe prefer lay peoples company rather than his brother priest, only small thing but can lead to disaster if not corrected.
I guess that is how I see this crisis now, small things but put them together and…..! The lifting of the excommunications: Why did bishop Fellay ask for it when we in the eyes of the SSPX were not excommunicated in the first place? Then not seeing Archbishops name nor Bishop deCastro Meyer’s name maybe should of sounded alarms. The motu Propio The Priests were free to say it anyway, then the ordasity of calling it an extraordinary rite, and the novus ordo an ordinary rite, no no no things do not add up. What about Bishop Williamson treatment does not add up, like him or not he has not done anything that he would not have done when the Archbishop was alive. He is protecting the faith and explaining it. You look at the introduction of Maxy Krah into the SSPX and hell the alarm bells are getting louder and louder. The Dominican novus ordo sister that got permission from rome to join the traditional SSPX Dominicans. Can probably think of a lot more examples but that is enough for now.

I ask myself where has rome changed from lets say 1988 till now to justify the SSPX returning and you no what, I can’t answer it, if anything rome is worse. They still are the artists in ambiguous writings and sucking up to those jews in my book and still canot be trusted. I cannot see too many good signs.

In another thread you denied communion with anyone saying an una cuм mass, that is a schismatic act, thusly you are no different then the Schismatics you just cited.

It is neccesary to convert Rome to restore the Church to what it was, your lack of faith in the possibility of it happening shows a lack of faith in God.

Athanasius faced tougher odds and succeeded, so too will we in time.

Over time we will convert them then those who were heretics will be condemned as such, the reason the Sedecavantists do not want us to even try is because you are afraid we will succeed.

i.e., why not mass una cuм Lutherans? or Jews? or Muslims?Don't we want to convert them?

because the result of that would be an end to the Crisis sooner rather then later and thusly the Salvation of more souls.

We cannot be excommunicated, once again you fail to understand the laws of the church

There are typically two schools of thought regarding this, both of which are valid:

1. He who communes with heretics makes himself a heretic, by implicitly wishing them Godspeed in their works. We should retire from the company of heretics and allow ourselves freedom from the corrupting influences of Satan.

2. Those heretics may never hear the truth proclaimed unless we tell them. Thus, we will be salt to the conciliar church, and work for renewal from the inside, whether by keeping our traditionalism quiet and seeking to occupy positions at CCD and RCIA where we will have the oppurtunity to plant the seeds of Tradition; or by simply not abandoning the Novus Ordo PEOPLE, although we may despise their "priests" and masses.

I have been invited by conciliar priests to teach CCD before. It boggles my mind what I would do...Probably give them all copies of the Douay Catechism and Go line by line...

My Point is that there have been saints on both sides of the fence; I.E. the Great Western Schism, especialyl St. Vincent Ferrer, who defended the Anti-Pope Benedict XIII and was arguably one of the greatest saints who ever lived.

I like the idea of Not communing with heretics. But I also like the idea of not abandoning these people to their ignorance, and if there is something I can do and say, or even if there is a position I could take that could help save souls...

What do you think?

Well, not just since early 2009 I've absolutely no reason to trust Bishop Fellay or his assistants, namely Fr Pfluger. They brought us Krah, and that's just the one bad egg most Internet users who're aware of the Krah-Gate know of! There are others, too.