http://nonpossumus-vcr.blogspot.mx/

Machine translation

TALKS at the Graduate Institute of St. Pius X: Bishop Fellay SAYS ARCHBISHOP LEFEBVRE ALWAYS WANTED AN AGREEMENT WITH ROME
On 10 and 11 November took place about Seminars at the University Institute St. Pius X. It was attended by Bishop Fellay.
A forum member levé A s'est évêque attending such conferences reports on Bishop Fellay's conference:


Colloquium at St. Pius X Institute in Paris.

Conclusion of Bishop Fellay
Sunday, 11 November 14:30.
In a hotel lounge Lutetia.

The room is filled halfway, only a two-seat is occupied.
(I do not think there are more than 200 listeners)

Definitely not Bishop Fellay attracts crowds of Tradition, there were so many empty seats as the day before. My neighbor was surprised and regrets, I simply told him that many people interested in this conversation about the Vatican II chose to remain in their homes as soon as they learned that Bishop Fellay would participate.

After a very informative conference Gleize father demonstrating the futility of teaching evolution versus constant teaching of the Catholic Church, the institute's director gave the word to Bishop Fellay. (The father left the conference Gleize)

The theme of his lecture was "Archbishop Lefebvre and the new teaching of the Council".

For more than an hour or an hour and a half, Bishop Fellay illustrated the attitude of Archbishop Lefebvre against the Church reconcile with quotes "conciliar" wrong.

I expected much less this!

Even Monsignor Fellay opposed Archbishop Lefebvre to Cardinal Ratzinger about Gaudium et Spes ("that Benedict is the key of the Council", he says)

To Monsignor Lefebvre "The garment is the shepherd, but the shepherd's voice but not the wolf."

The show tends to proclaim that Archbishop Lefebvre did not change from 1960 to 1991 in terms of liberal ideas. ("In opposition to those who advance the idea of a tightening at the end of his life")

In 1974: "We join with all our heart to Catholic Rome, reject and have always rejected the neo-modernism ... that is expressed in the council."
"No authority or higher in the hierarchy can push to diminish the faith of the Church taught for centuries XIX"

In 1976: "The liberal and modernist influences" have made ​​a "real plot".
"This reform was born a new Reformed church, the Conciliar Church."

Warns against "a conspiracy of the enemies of the church acting against it for two centuries: the secret societies."

"Just observe the reaction of the Masons, the liberals and Protestants during the Council."

References and comments go to par.

Bishop Fellay even dares to quote the words of Monsignor Lefebvre discussing his letter to Cardinal Ratzinger (04/10/1987):
"Even if you grant us a bishop, even if you give us some autonomy from the bishops, even if you grant us the entire liturgy of 1962, if you grant us continue with the seminars and the Fraternity as we do now, we can not work, because we work in diametrically opposite directions: you, you work for the de-Christianization of society, and we are working to Christianization. "


Note that Bishop Fellay did not finish the event, lacked the following:
Rome has lost the faith, dear friends. Rome is in apostasy.
But then, from 17:30 hrs, suddenly changes tone (now give us the lesson to learn from this)

This beautiful sign language as Monsignor Lefebvre is illustrated by another phrase of Bishop "who wholeheartedly wanted an agreement with Rome" (phrase uttered three months later).

Comment:

"Attention, Archbishop Lefebvre had faith in the church and always sought an agreement with it."

"Monsignor Lefebvre had a supernatural vision of the Church and I sincerely hope a deal»
(The words may be slightly different, but this is the sense that Bishop Fellay wanted to give its conclusion).

I make the observation that: despite the conclusion, the conference achieved its goal, much applauded assistance.

We also note that some remained standing looking rejecting the bishop's blessing.

The entire post was taken from http://nonpossumus-vcr.blogspot.mx/ ( a Resistance website) with no commentary added by me. What I could gather from this article was that:

Fr Gleize was the first, and probably the main speaker, his theme being Evolution in Church teaching versus the Constant teaching of the Church. He left the room after his talk.

Bishop Fellay was next, with his favorite theme: There is no Deal but there is one (Ditto at St Nicolas).
His presence put people off. There were hardly 200 people present and every other seat was empty. He played around with Archbishop Lefebvre's words.

There was an applause at the end. It may have been the normal, polite applause. There were two speakers at this conference, so it cannot be said with certainty at which one the applause was really directed.

Finally, when Bp Fellay gave his blessing, some in the audience refused it by remaining standing.

I think it is correct to say that Archbishop Lefebvre always wanted an agreement with Rome--eternal Rome, that is.

I disagree, I think it is still incorrect to say that.

Archbishop Lefebvre had never been in disagreement with Eternal Rome in the first place, therefore there's no need to reagree with her but only do what he's done: "Be subject to her"; which necessary implies fighting against Conciliar Rome with all its strength.