Not sure what to make of this video interview.
On the one hand, Bishop Fellay clearly says that, on the subject of religious liberty, "In our discussions with Rome, they do not say that there is a right to error."
This of course is our main problem with DH.
On the other hand, there seems to be something "different" in his "understanding" or description of the problem of religious liberty.
He says that people do not understand what Rome intended to teach on religious liberty.
At the very least then, we should all be able to admit that, whether or not Rome intended to teach a right to error in DH, the words of the doc themselves are capable of lending that interpretation, and are themselves the cause of the "confusion" (and in need of editing therefore).
I seem to remember that Fr. Congar (Arch-Modernist and briefly Cardinal) was given the task of reconciling the teachings of DH with the Syllabus of Pius IX.
He admitted that "certain provisions of DH do say, materially, the opposite of the Syllabus." (Parphrase, but easy to verify).
The point: It seems that Menzingen has learned trads will not just roll over and take a deal. Therefore, they are developing more persuasive arguments very recently, instead of resorting to bare authority.
This makes me very nervous, and a little confused on certain points.