I recently came across this interview by Bishop Fellay:
“We are a Disturbing Factor in the Church”
https://sspx.org/en/news-events/news/bishop-fellay-interview-%E2%80%9Cwe-are-disturbing-factor-church%E2%80%9D-39449I was astonished at this comment by him:
"
We never said that the Council made heretical statements outright. But it did remove the protective barrier against error and in this way caused error to crop up."Having read a number of books by Archbishop Lefebvre and Michael Davies, the word heresy is used to describe parts of the Council docuмents all the time. Here is one:
The Have Uncrowned Him
The Council took pleasure in exalting the salvific values, or the values – period – of the other religions. Speaking of the non-Catholic Christian religions, Vatican II teaches that “Although we believe them to be victims of deficiencies, they are not in any way devoid of meaning and of value in the mystery of salvation. This is heresy!
Marcel Lefebvre, They Have Uncrowned Him: From Liberalism to Apostasy, the Conciliar Tragedy (Angelus Press Kansas City, 1988), 176.
“Statement on the New Mass and the Pope” on 8th November 1979 by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre:
One must then examine in what measure Pope Paul VI willed to engage in infallibility in the diverse cases where he signed texts close to heresy if not formally heretical.
Michael Davies, Apologia pro Marcel Lefebvre, III vols., vol. II (Dickinson, Texas: The Angelus Press, 1983), 372.
Am I the only one that thinks a new Rubicon has been explicitly crossed?
I'm glad to see Louie Verrecchio sounding the horn:
Topic: Bishop Fellay interview - 30th June 2018 (Read 417 times)