It was only a few days ago that CFN's Brian McCall published this stupid article.
https://www.catholicfamilynews.org/blog/2018/7/14/reflections-on-the-election-of-the-new-superior-general-of-the-society-of-st-pius-x
It opened with this criticism of the Resistance (now fully vindicated by today's news):
"The Society of St. Pius X announced by communique on July 11 the [color=rgba(139, 148, 156, 0.92)]election of Father Davide Pagliarani[/color] (https://www.catholicfamilynews.org/blog/2018/7/11/sspx-general-chapter-elects-italian-priest-as-new-superior-general) as the Superior General of the SSPX for the next 12 years. The initial reactions were most interesting. Several websites and forums that host comments aligned with the so called “Resistance” denounced Father Pagliarani as a liberal “company man” who would swiftly move toward a compromise with the Roman authorities. Some went so far to claim that Bishop Fellay would essentially remain in control and drive the move toward a compromised regularization. At the same time, [color=rgba(139, 148, 156, 0.92)]New Church and secular commentators tried to claim Bishop Fellay was “toppled”[/color] (http://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france/2018/07/11/01016-20180711ARTFIG00354-lefebvristes-mgr-fellay-est-evince-l-abbe-davide-pagliarani-devient-superieur-general.php) by a reactionary faction that would end any possible regularization by the Roman authorities. Such is the state of misinformation and rumor buzzing around the SSPX."
Retraction, Mr. McCall?
.
I expect there's NO WAY McCall will retract any of this.
He's either a paid shill for Menzingen or else he's just a dupe, entirely taken in by their magic show scheme.
.
In the article you link, Brian McCall stoops to flat-out lying about the Resistance:
.
Likewise, the “Resistance” conglomeration who fear a regularization at all costs see his openness to the possibility that the time will come when Tradition will be given its rightful place again as a threat to their position of no regularization under any circuмstances.
.
I have to wonder, did someone tell him to say that or did he just make it up out of thin air.
Because there isn't anyone in the Resistance who would describe our outlook in that way.
"...who fear a regularization at all costs?" -- At all costs - ignoring the "cost" of Rome converting to the true Faith??
Maybe for McCall that would be too high of a price to pay!! But he'd never admit that, even if it were true.
.
What makes McCall think that a deal with unconverted Rome would "give Tradition its rightful place again?"
Maybe he's never really heard what the Resistance has to say, and only listens to what Menzingen CLAIMS the Resistance says.
He must be oblivious to the fact that,
"THE SUBJECTS DO NOT FORM THE SUPERIORS - THE SUPERIORS FORM THE SUBJECTS."
And where did he get the idea that our position is "no regularization under any circuмstances?"
Or, which might really be the case, does McCall believe that Rome will not convert "under any circuмstances?"