Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Bishop Fellay and the General Council  (Read 4366 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Bishop Fellay and the General Council
« Reply #5 on: May 22, 2012, 06:33:01 PM »
Gee whiz, Matthew, are you sure you want to be so hard on the guy, I mean, what if he were here to defend himself???

Quote from: Ite ad Thomam
I agree.


Well, then, so much for that theory.......................... :sign-surrender:

Bishop Fellay and the General Council
« Reply #6 on: May 22, 2012, 08:56:17 PM »
Yeah, must be the same EM from Ignis.

Matthew, there is a reason EM was banned from Ignis Ardens. He was banned for his dogmatic rallying against those who are against a deal, not to mention his obsession over sedevacantism. He won't add much to this forum.


Bishop Fellay and the General Council
« Reply #7 on: May 22, 2012, 09:19:49 PM »
Quote from: EM20
I was banned simply because I tried to stop the sedevacantists taking over that forum as they have with this.


You can't fight every battle.

Quote
The problem was that the person who does the banning is very sympathetic to the sedevacantists because he does not hold the position of the Society, that Benedict XVI is certainly the Pope, but that maybe he is (SSPX position), or maybe he isn't (sedevacantist view), so for him the sede position is equally legitimate.


I think GS merely thought the sede position is POSSIBLE, as Archbishop LeFebvre did. Furthermore, I like GS because he opposes a deal with Rome and supports the other three Bishops. You are another dogmatic Bishop Fellay supporter, telling us over at IA that we "should all be ashamed of ourselves" for criticizing his ACTIONS.

Bishop Fellay and the General Council
« Reply #8 on: May 22, 2012, 10:03:18 PM »
Quote from: EcclesiaMilitans20
I support only the Truth,


This is the truth:

Rome has lost the Faith

Quote
and I do not take kindly to calumnies (nor should anyone), especially those directed at priests and bishops.


What is being said is not calumny, but the truth.

The truth is that Bishop Fellay is going the wrong way.

Quote
In fact, I have a great sympathy for Bishop Williamson, but also for all the Society bishops.
Those who should be ashamed of themselves are those who are calumniating, detracting and insulting the dignity of a bishop of the Holy Mother Church. They have no real material to criticize his actions so they make some up, or just start attacking his person, which is despicable.


Those who are blindly loyal to clerical perfidy are the reason that the Church is in crisis.

Bishop Fellay and the General Council
« Reply #9 on: May 23, 2012, 02:23:18 AM »
Will the SSPX general chapter (general superior's halftime) be held in June or July 2012, as announced earlier (can't remember where, however...) ?

I heard rumours it had been canceled because Bp Fellay could fear his dethronement, but other rumours say these rumours are just, well, rumours. Ahem.

What if the New-SSPX will already be part of the New-Church by then? Wouldn't that make any general chapter redundant?