Aside from the question regarding the validity of Bishop Webster’s own episcopal consecration, there is the matter of the botched essential form (first discovered in the video by Ladislaus).
Fr. Pfeiffer then claimed Bishop Webster conditionally consecrated him shortly thereafter.
I called Bishop Webster to inquire about the veracity of this report, and he confirmed to me that he did in fact perform a conditional consecration.
Nevertheless, on the one hand, because no video of this conditional consecration has ever surfaced, we are put in the uncomfortable situation of having to accept their word for it.
Equally concerning, is the fact that the form was so badly botched in the first attempt, one can’t help wondering how well the form was repeated in the second attempt. One would think Pfeiffer and Assoc. would have him first practice it for the second attempt, but that is an assumption, and again, there is no record.
Unfortunately for these young men, I would have to consider their ordinations to be doubtful,A larger issue is, what kind of seminary training did they get? By multiple, multiple first hand accounts, Fr P was hardly ever there, there was no structure, seminarians were “teaching” seminarians and Pablo was in the mix of it all - cancelling classes to do this or that non-school task.
A larger issue is, what kind of seminary training did they get? By multiple, multiple first hand accounts, Fr P was hardly ever there, there was no structure, seminarians were “teaching” seminarians and Pablo was in the mix of it all - cancelling classes to do this or that non-school task.
.
What a nightmare on so many levels.
And then there's
- Diabolical influence of Pablo the Mexican
Are they going to start serving Fr. Pfeiffer's missions now or will they go out on their own?
I went to two of his resistance Masses back in the day before he became estranged from Bishop Williamson. Maybe if these priests could help out Father Pfeiffer could be at the seminary more often. Then he could churn out some quality geocentrist priests.
No, even if he was relieved of all his travelling duties, he would still be incapable of forming good priests because "No one gives what he doesn't have". Nemo dat quod non habet.Well he could teach them how to put menstrual blood in someone's food to bind them to the devil. Or does only Pablo do things like that?
Are they going to start serving Fr. Pfeiffer's missions now or will they go out on their own?
I can't see Fr Pfeiffer letting them do their own thing. He wants to build some sort of empire. He will want control.
I can't see Fr Pfeiffer letting them do their own thing. He wants to build some sort of empire. He will want control.They can leave at any time. It's not unheard of for traditional Catholic seminarians to pretend to be obedient until ordination time, and then once they are priests, to go off on their own, abandoning the Bishop who ordained them.
Last comment:
The satanic malefice or curse PtM is using is the same concept that's behind the Fauci/Gates ναccιnєs.
Folks who are ναccιnαted are partaking of human tissues which were sacrificed to satan.
Not only are they being poisoned, they are also receiving a curse.
One of the "deacons", Kaldawi, left a few months ago and within weeks got engaged to be married ! So much for the discernment process at the cult HQ.
Why did you and/or the mother of the ex-seminarian, bring "re-marry" into it? I don't see anywhere in this thread where "remarriage" was brought up. Sounds like a red herring or strawman to me. I was confused at first! I deleted that whole red herring from the thread.No strawman or red herring Matthew. I wasn't paying attention when I, and I alone, said he had not married. Punish me if you will. The truth remains however, that he is not engaged.
No strawman or red herring Matthew. I wasn't paying attention when I, and I alone, said he had not married. Punish me if you will. The truth remains however, that he is not engaged.
Punish me if you will.
You're passing over several points:
1. Why are you and/or Mrs. Kaldawi upset that people would "gossip" about Steven Kaldawi as being "engaged"? (Again, being engaged is not a sin; it is normally an occasion of joy. The normal response to learning such news is "Congratulations!")
2. Why would such a baseless rumor get started? Are you saying he had no girl he was interested in, serious about? He wasn't close to getting engaged? What exactly is the true situation? Lots of other seminarians have left Boston, KY over the years -- and not a one had a cօռspιʀαcʏ of enemies making up fake news that any of these ex-seminarians were engaged. Why would this happen all the sudden with Mrs. Kaldawi's son?
In my experience, there's more to the story in cases like this. I want to hear the other side of the story. I don't believe "the idea that Steven Kaldawi was engaged to be married carries NO kernel of truth, it was made up out of thin air." There is simply no possible motivation or reason for such a fabrication.
Sorry not sorry -- I always use my faculty of reason. I can't turn off my brain.
I'm interested in the truth of course, in this case as much as any other -- which is why I'd like to hear from the source who informed Cebu about this alleged engagement.
P.S. Please stop playing the martyr/victim. I never threatened you in the least. Imagine you're talking to someone and they all the sudden recoil in terror, "Please don't hurt me!", holding up their arms as if to defend themselves from an assailant -- when you were never the slightest bit threatening or violent. That's how I feel right now.
There's always Google Translate, if you need my words translated into a different language...:confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:
One of the "deacons", Kaldawi, left a few months ago and within weeks got engaged to be married ! So much for the discernment process at the cult HQ.
I heard something about this departure, which is a glorious event. A soul awakened and saved.
One of the "deacons", Kaldawi, left a few months ago and within weeks got engaged to be married !This is a false statement.
Something to the effect that this person had taken vows and needed a Catholic dispensation to get married?This is false.
I heard something about this departure, which is a glorious event. A soul awakened and saved.Amen.
Also, if you go on to Facebook and look Steven up you will find that he publicly states that he has a girlfriend(In a relationship). Nowhere on his public Facebook(We are not Facebook friends) does it say he is engaged.
Stephen Kaldawi
7h
6/4/21
God is so Good! 😊🙏✝️ Once again, just wanted to share the joy and thanksgiving of my recent visit with my dear girlfriend and her family in Alabama for a few days. Definitely moving forward with our relationship, praying for guidance as we grow in our Love for each other and for Our Creator and Redeemer. Rightly did Saint Augustine instruct: "Love, and do what you want"; for when we truly love one another, nothing less can fill our hearts!
Also from his Facebook page:
4/4/21
Dear Friends, Family, and Acquaintances:
Happy Easter Sunday! 🌞 🐣🙏✝️
For whomever may have been wondering, a lot has happened in my life during this Lent and since I asked for prayers to discern the Will of God. I will briefly summarize it here.
As most of you know, I have spent the last five and a half years in a Traditional Catholic Seminary belonging to a "branch" of the Society of St. Pius X, called the "SSPX - Marian Corps" or "Resistance". I had joined them at the age of 18, easily influenced by their zealous and charismatic mission. In the last year, I had been having serious doubts and unsettled objections about their purpose, and I came to the conclusion that they are basically an unjustified sect falsely claiming to be essentially the last remnant of faithful Catholic clergy in the World.
So last February, after concentrated consideration and prayer, I decided to leave their seminary, with the intention of contacting the mainstream SSPX to inquire if I may and should continue my formation with them. After doing so, I was informed by the SSPX that according to two official docuмents from the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith in Rome in 1976 and 1983 (links below), the lineage through which I had been ordained a Deacon at that seminary was juridically null and void, so I had already been automatically laicized upon my ordination to the Diaconate. Moreover, after personally explaining to my old SSPX pastor the grave difficulties I have had with my seminary formation, he strongly advised me NOT to continue formation to the Sacred Priesthood, but to explain my case by letter to Rome, and to ask for a particular confirmation of my lay status, whereby I am (already) relieved of the rights and duties of being a Deacon, and also for a confirmation of a dispensation of the private vows I had taken before and recently been dispensed of by my SSPX Confessor.
Given my particular difficulties with the seminary formation, I do not believe that the religious life of a brother or monk is the Will of God for me either. So after further prayer, consideration, and consultation, I have decided to prepare for the married state. This may come as a shock to many of you, but I am sure that this is indeed the Will of God for me, and what will best contribute to my true happiness and my Salvation.
Thank you all for your prayers, and be assured of my own for you. May our Risen Savior bless you all and make you Saints! 🙂🙏✝️
______________________________________________
Decrees from the Roman CDF on the Abp. Thuc Lineage:
https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/docuмents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19760917_illegitimas-ordinationes_en.html?fbclid=IwAR0qbd5QiqzJ9MAcWXCEwrPdiN7nAcNDqrJ25xFJYLp7IXcaVVnGcF1NqJs
https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/docuмents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19830312_poenae-canonicae_en.html?fbclid=IwAR0ys6KJ_UHQF6OgNxXpQcOa1AgIKazrow8NEfPrT-9AqSaqyp4tflo6Fpk
Given my particular difficulties with the seminary formation, I do not believe that the religious life of a brother or monk is the Will of God for me either. So after further prayer, consideration, and consultation, I have decided to prepare for the married state.