Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Bishop(?) Pfeiffer’s 1st Mass Live NOW!  (Read 3130 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Bishop(?) Pfeiffer’s 1st Mass Live NOW!
« on: August 01, 2020, 08:05:43 PM »
Will there be a sermon??



:popcorn: :popcorn:

Re: Bishop(?) Pfeiffer’s 1st Mass Live NOW!
« Reply #1 on: August 01, 2020, 08:12:27 PM »
Too late!  Darn!


Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Bishop(?) Pfeiffer’s 1st Mass Live NOW!
« Reply #2 on: August 02, 2020, 10:27:22 AM »
I've only listened to about half of his sermon, and he's just rabidly attacking sedevacantism ... after having received episcopal consecration from a sedevacantist bishop.  Blabbering on about how the enemies are Francis are his enemies, and that he swore in his oath to go after all the enemies of Francis and his successors.

What an unbelievable hypocrite.

When the break happened in the U.S., those three seminarians who were secretly sympathetic with the rebellious priests got oradained and immediately left to join them, they were attacked for having "stolen" the priesthood.

This is a clear case of +?Pfeiffer having stolen the episcopacy.  Just days after receiving consecration from a sedevacantist, he's brutally attacking sedevacantists (which include his bishop).

There's no other word for this man than that he is a complete scuм.

Somebody needs to alert Bishop Webster to this (some here are in contact with him) lest +?Pfeiffer go grovelling back for the conditional consecration.  Would serve him right for this to have been invalid.  I'm skeptical about whether a conditional consecration happened.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Bishop(?) Pfeiffer’s 1st Mass Live NOW!
« Reply #3 on: August 02, 2020, 10:32:59 AM »
This is true regardless of whether you agree with sedevacantism or if you don't.

If I sought out consecration from an R&R bishop, I would certainly be very respectful about how I discussed my disagreement with him about the subject, and would never viciously attack him in public.  Otherwise, I would not seek consecration from him in the first place.

I know it was a matter of time before +?Pfeiffer turned on Bishop Webster.  He's turned on everyone else ... except for the untouchable Pablo.  I just didn't think it would happen this quickly.  Perhaps some of his cult followers are questioning him about why he'd seed consecration from a sedevacantist and a Feeneyite ... and he feels the need to do damage control.  I imagine that some of his followers have doubts about the +Thuc line also.

Re: Bishop(?) Pfeiffer’s 1st Mass Live NOW!
« Reply #4 on: August 02, 2020, 10:33:43 AM »
I've only listened to about half of his sermon, and he's just rabidly attacking sedevacantism ... after having received episcopal consecration from a sedevacantist bishop.  Blabbering on about how the enemies are Francis are his enemies, and that he swore in his oath to go after all the enemies of Francis and his successors.

What an unbelievable hypocrite.

When the break happened in the U.S., those three seminarians who were secretly sympathetic with the rebellious priests got oradained and immediately left to join them, they were attacked for having "stolen" the priesthood.

This is a clear case of +?Pfeiffer having stolen the episcopacy.  Just days after receiving consecration from a sedevacantist, he's brutally attacking sedevacantists (which include his bishop).

There's no other word for this man than that he is a complete scuм.

Somebody needs to alert Bishop Webster to this (some here are in contact with him) lest +?Pfeiffer go grovelling back for the conditional consecration.  Would serve him right for this to have been invalid.  I'm skeptical about whether a conditional consecration happened.

Someone should call Webster and ask if there was a conditional consecration.

If anyone can get me his phone number, I will do it.