Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]

Author Topic: Fr. David Hewko's Statement on the Episcopal Consecration of Fr. Pfeiffer  (Read 5327 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Venantius0518

Re: Fr. David Hewko's Statement on the Episcopal Consecration of Fr. Pfeiffer
« Reply #20 on: August 02, 2020, 08:52:22 PM »
Quote from: Tradman on August 02, 2020, 08:19:05 PM
, even if Bishop Webster was outside the Church. 
i don't think so.
.
If the conditional consecration happened, prove it.
Logged

Offline Tradman

  • Supporter
Re: Fr. David Hewko's Statement on the Episcopal Consecration of Fr. Pfeiffer
« Reply #21 on: August 03, 2020, 08:34:34 AM »
Quote from: Venantius0518 on August 02, 2020, 08:52:22 PM
i don't think so.
.
If the conditional consecration happened, prove it.
Yea, even if Webster was excommunicated, orders were communicated to Pfeiffer.  Canon 209. 
  • OC 2261 §2 (NC 1335). The Church suspends its prohibition for an excommunicated or suspended priest celebrating the Sacraments or posing acts requiring jurisdiction, provided it be in favor of the faithful who request it for any reasonable cause at all, and especially if there is no other minister.
 
Logged

Offline MarcelJude

Re: Fr. David Hewko's Statement on the Episcopal Consecration of Fr. Pfeiffer
« Reply #22 on: August 03, 2020, 08:45:48 AM »
This sermon is regarding the consecration of Fr.(Bp.) Joe Pfeiffer. Fr. Chazal clearly states his take on how the cosecration went. The consecration creates a question of validity. The line that Fr.(Bp.) Joe Pfeiffer is creating could be a noxious line. Dangerous, POISONOUS!!The consecration is a question of validity.By the looks of it, Fr.(Bp.) Joe Pfeiffer has officially cut the line between him and the late Archbishop Lefebvre. Please watch the video.
Logged

Offline Venantius0518

Re: Fr. David Hewko's Statement on the Episcopal Consecration of Fr. Pfeiffer
« Reply #23 on: August 03, 2020, 12:25:21 PM »
Quote from: Tradman on August 03, 2020, 08:34:34 AM
Yea, even if Webster was excommunicated, orders were communicated to Pfeiffer.  Canon 209.
  • OC 2261 §2 (NC 1335). The Church suspends its prohibition for an excommunicated or suspended priest celebrating the Sacraments or posing acts requiring jurisdiction, provided it be in favor of the faithful who request it for any reasonable cause at all, and especially if there is no other minister.

1. Not if he didnt say the correct form.
2. Not if his own ordination is in question.
3. Even if fr. Pfeiffer is a bishop, who would accept his utter hipocracy and bashing his own consecrator the day after his consecration? 
It is questionable no matter how you slice it.
.
I am glad to be away from that mess.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]
« previous next »