Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Calgary Bishop attacks SSPX AFTER he accepts for his church  (Read 1776 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Miseremini

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4623
  • Reputation: +3690/-320
  • Gender: Female
Calgary Bishop attacks SSPX AFTER he accepts for his church
« on: October 14, 2012, 05:45:42 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The following letter was taken from the Calgary Diocese website in Canada.
    This past summer the SSPX purchased St. Michael's church (and renamed it St. Denis) which belonged to the diocese.  When the deal was final and they had their $$$$$ the Bishop published the following letter, errors, inuendos and all.

    Important Clarification re St. Dennis ChurchNews - Parishes



    St. Michael's Catholic Church has moved and is now located at 800 - 85th Street SW. The building just off of Bow Trail and 45th Street, formerly known as St. Michael's, has been purchased by the St. Pius X Society and is named St. Dennis Catholic Church. However, St. Dennis is not a Catholic church and the fact that they are identifying themselves as a Catholic church is problematic and confusing for many people.

    Historical Context:

    I.  The Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) was founded by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre in order to perpetuate the Tridentine Mass. He did not reject Vatican II, or even the reform of the Mass (he voted for the Council docuмent that called for it) but he did reject the current rites, promulgated in 1969, though he did not argue they were invalid. He started a seminary in Ecône, Switzerland, to train priests, which he then ordained. As a bishop who was not an Ordinary (bishop of a diocese) at the time, he was not permitted to ordain priests. Pope Paul VI suspended his priestly faculties, and those he ordained, for defiance of Church law. Time going on, the Lefebvre movement rejected ecuмenism and the statements of the Council on religious liberty, as contrary to Tradition.

    Within the Traditionalist movement, which is certainly dominated by the Society, other branches developed. For example, the SSPX uses the 1962 Missal, which includes changes made by John XXIII. Some in the movement reject any changes, and thus will use only the Missal from Pius XII's time. Others argue that the See of Peter is vacant since Pius XII (sedevacantists). Others have elected their own popes (there were, at last count, at least 3 antipopes).

    In 1989, Archbishop Lefebvre, fearing that he would soon die and leave no one to ordain priests for the SSPX, sought an agreement with the Holy See for the lawful continuation of the Society. After first reaching one, with Cardinal Ratzinger acting for the Pope, Lefebvre reversed himself, and in an act which was ipso facto schismatic consecrated four bishops without a papal mandate and incurred an automatic excommunication, confirmed a few days later by Decree of the Holy See.

    2. In these circuмstances, some number of seminarians at Ecône and priests of the SSPX, not wanting to go into schism, sought an agreement with Rome, which concluded with the founding of the Priestly (Sacerdotal) Fraternity of St. Peter (FSSP). This immediate erection of the Fraternity by the Holy See, without all the preliminaries of time and formality usually required of time, was a tremendous charity by the Pope toward the former members of the SSPX, who have returned it with loyalty and faithfulness, as well as the devotion to the Tridentine rites which is their proper charism. On the other hand, the SSPX has gotten more strident over time, harboring sedevacantists and others with positions more extreme than Archbishop Lefebvre would have tolerated.

    3. On January 21, 2009, the Congregation for Bishops remitted the excommunication of four prelates of the Society of Saint Pius X. The very grave penalty of latae sententiae excommunication, which these bishops incurred on 30 June 1988, was a consequence of their having been illegitimately ordained by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre.

    The remission of the excommunication has freed the four bishops from a very serious canonical penalty, but it has not changed the juridical status of the Society of Saint Pius X, which presently does not enjoy any canonical recognition by the Catholic Church. The four bishops, even though they have been released from excommunication, have no canonical function in the Church and do not licitly exercise any ministry within it.

    A full recognition of the Second Vatican Council and the Magisterium of Popes John XXIII, Paul VI, John Paul I, John Paul II and Benedict XVI himself is an indispensable condition for any future recognition of the Society of Saint Pius X.

    Practical Consequences:

    1. According to Canon 300 - No association may call itself catholic except with the consent of the competent ecclesiastical authority.... St. Dennis Church does not have canonical status within the Roman Catholic Diocese of Calgary.

    2. Roman Catholics of the Diocese of Calgary should not attend St. Dennis Church, nor receive sacraments from any priest who is a member of the Society of Saint Pius X unless in dire emergency or danger of death.

    3.  Roman Catholics of the Diocese of Calgary who wish to worship according to the Tridentine Rite are invited to celebrate the Traditional Latin Mass, approved by the Diocese, at St. Anthony's Parish, 5340 - 4th Street SW Calgary. A priest from the Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter has been appointed Associate Pastor of St. Anthony’s Parish.

    September 21, 2012

    Bishop Henry
    "Let God arise, and let His enemies be scattered: and them that hate Him flee from before His Holy Face"  Psalm 67:2[/b]


    Offline dailyrosary

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 37
    • Reputation: +26/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Calgary Bishop attacks SSPX AFTER he accepts for his church
    « Reply #1 on: October 14, 2012, 06:15:06 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • It is my understanding that a parishioner did the transaction for the buying of Saint Michaels.
    I do not believe it was known the SSPX wanted it until after the sale.


    Offline Miseremini

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4623
    • Reputation: +3690/-320
    • Gender: Female
    Calgary Bishop attacks SSPX AFTER he accepts for his church
    « Reply #2 on: October 14, 2012, 07:33:49 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: dailyrosary
    It is my understanding that a parishioner did the transaction for the buying of Saint Michaels.
    I do not believe it was known the SSPX wanted it until after the sale.


    Yes a parishoner probably handled the transaction.  BUT ....the Bishop on seeing the offer and  NOT seeing a condition for a zone change (so the church could be used for some other purpose) would have immediately asked himself "which denomination is buying my church?"  Lest it be purchased by a satanic cult etc a prudent Bishop would have enquired as to its intended use.   He was under no obligation to sell. Even at full price or more he didn't have to sell (albeit he'd probably have to pay the commission but even then probably not if the agent ever wanted to do business with the diocese again)  IF his primary concern was money, then he has no right to object AFTER THE FACT! ! !

    My concern was especially how misleading many of his statements were and that apparently this letter was sent to all the NO churches.
    "Let God arise, and let His enemies be scattered: and them that hate Him flee from before His Holy Face"  Psalm 67:2[/b]


    Offline Ferdinand

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 391
    • Reputation: +0/-1
    • Gender: Male
    Calgary Bishop attacks SSPX AFTER he accepts for his church
    « Reply #3 on: October 16, 2012, 11:01:01 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Bishop Fr. Henry "ordained bishop in 1986" in the Bugnini rite should refrain from throwing stones whilst in his glass house.  :facepalm:

    Offline Viva Cristo Rey

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18495
    • Reputation: +5752/-1981
    • Gender: Female
    Calgary Bishop attacks SSPX AFTER he accepts for his church
    « Reply #4 on: October 16, 2012, 08:01:20 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • It goes to prove how much they detest the sspx and everything it stands for.  It's going on all over in USA too.  They sold off property to protestants and never gave them any letter like that...

    All love for everyone and religious freedom except for "traditional' catholics.

    They wanted the sspx to suppress and controll it.  
    May God bless you and keep you


    Offline Viva Cristo Rey

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18495
    • Reputation: +5752/-1981
    • Gender: Female
    Calgary Bishop attacks SSPX AFTER he accepts for his church
    « Reply #5 on: October 16, 2012, 08:04:13 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Miseremini
    Quote from: dailyrosary
    It is my understanding that a parishioner did the transaction for the buying of Saint Michaels.
    I do not believe it was known the SSPX wanted it until after the sale.


    Yes a parishoner probably handled the transaction.  BUT ....the Bishop on seeing the offer and  NOT seeing a condition for a zone change (so the church could be used for some other purpose) would have immediately asked himself "which denomination is buying my church?"  Lest it be purchased by a satanic cult etc a prudent Bishop would have enquired as to its intended use.   He was under no obligation to sell. Even at full price or more he didn't have to sell (albeit he'd probably have to pay the commission but even then probably not if the agent ever wanted to do business with the diocese again)  IF his primary concern was money, then he has no right to object AFTER THE FACT! ! !

    My concern was especially how misleading many of his statements were and that apparently this letter was sent to all the NO churches.



    lYes, they would sell off properties to athiest  vand devil worshippers and even secular organizations then to traditional catholics.

    They hate all things Catholic and traditional.  The above is what is expressed all over usa, canada etc.  even after the 2009 excommunications.  Many within NO are even praying that we herectics come back because misery and lukewarmness loves company.  
    May God bless you and keep you