.
Perhaps my leap of reference is causing some confusion.
Once upon a time, about 3 or 4 years ago, before +W's expulsion that is, +Fellay commanded (under 'obedience') him to cease and desist from his longstanding weekly dissemination of his Eleison Comments (EC).
+W could see this as an unreasonable demand, and therefore asked a very reasonable question, to wit, What Is It About My Eleison Comments That You Find So Unacceptable and/or Unbecoming of Public Dissemination?
Note, I did not use quotation marks.
Rather than putting +F through the rigors and inconvenience of searching for all the old issues for him to highlight with yellow and take notes in the margin or whatever, +W made copies himself. Just like in the old days, when you would ask your doctor for your "Medical Record," as my uncle a pediatrician assured me in 1992, "You get the whole shebang!" +W shipped a parcel containing hundreds of pages of Xeroxes, which covered all of his previous EC's.
Some readers might not have heard this nice story.
+W was doing +F a favor, and cordially requesting a polite response, as common decency and professional decorum would dictate. As in how any decent ambassador, AND ESPECIALLY A PRINCE OF THE CHURCH, would behave toward another of same.
+W included a note, saying that here are copies of all my previous EC's for your convenience. Please help me understand what you don't like about them by providing some kind of list of factual errors or objective doctrinal mistakes that I have made, and I will be more than happy to make corrections in due course for all to see. That is, show me where I am objectively wrong or improper and I promise to make public compensation for my erroneous past.
Or words to that effect.
What did he get from +F in reply?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . c r i c k e t s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Therefore, it became evident that +F was unwilling to identify anything of which he did not approve, for whatever reason (perhaps then it would have become more clear to all what his real, nefarious agenda was about, and he may have liked to keep that concealed so his lemmings would continue to be deceived, OR, perhaps +F was simply JEALOUS of the literary excellence of his brother bishop and realizing that the cows would all come home before he would ever be able to come within range of approaching same), and due to this unreasonable and COLD effrontery of +F, +W found it perfectly excusable to ignore +F's capricious and silly demand that +W would stop the EC's, which he proceeded to continue apace, even to this very day.
And the faithful lived happily ever after.
Isn't that a nice story?
.