Author Topic: Article about SSPX- Antisemetic Cult (Read 6742 times)

Telesphorus · « **Reply #15 on:** January 15, 2013, 12:10:42 PM »

Quote

Am I the only one who senses a bizarre double-standard at work

That's why it's called "the Big Lie" - to confront such enormities results in confusion and disbelief.

SeanJohnson · « **Reply #16 on:** January 15, 2013, 12:12:02 PM »

Quote from: Quo Vadis Petre

Oops. I mistakenly made my previous post before looking at the article and its author. Jeanette Pryor, the wife of the infamous J. Christopher Pryor, defender of тαℓмυdic and Zionist Jєωs! Very notorious for being a Zionist troll and attacking those who believe the ritual murders as "blood libels." This article is on par for the course for the searchers of "anti-Semitism."

I thought the name sounded familiar!

Columba · « **Reply #17 on:** January 15, 2013, 12:13:53 PM »

Quote from: MauricePinay

The author's husband, Christopher J. Pryor at work with the rabbis of Zion at the 2010 Journal for Antisemitism (JSA) Conference:

Mr Pryor says: "This is how you know that they're not really Catholic first but they're antisemitic politicians first is that they're willing to cooperate publicly with organizations with different religions ... who make very anti-Christians statements ..."

Am I the only one who senses a bizarre double-standard at work as Mr. Pryor sits on a panel alongside Rabbi Steven L. Jacobs, Rabbi Michael Berenbaum and Rabbi Richard L Rubenstein (at a conference where Daniel Goldhagen also spoke) declaring that you can know someone really isn't Catholic if they "cooperate publicly with organizations with different religions who make very anti-Christians statements"? I can barely imagine a more anti-Christian kahal than this.

No double standard. Conciliarism has become a junior partner in the Noahide movement so it is not really a different religion.

Capt McQuigg · « **Reply #18 on:** January 15, 2013, 12:46:54 PM »

Is Jeanette Pryor related to Christopher Pryor? He likes to play that "the SSPX is an anti-semitic cult" line of nonsense.

PenitentWoman · « **Reply #19 on:** January 15, 2013, 12:53:04 PM »

Social sciences are the worst thing a woman (or man) can study. If the career outlook wasn't so poor, I may have gravitated towards that as a major. I took a lot of SS, philosophy, and humanities.

This article summarizes a lot of why I've been told to stay far away from the "schismatic" churches. :scared2:

John Grace · « **Reply #20 on:** January 15, 2013, 12:57:45 PM »

Quote from: Quo Vadis Petre

Oops. I mistakenly made my previous post before looking at the article and its author. Jeanette Pryor, the wife of the infamous J. Christopher Pryor, defender of тαℓмυdic and Zionist Jєωs! Very notorious for being a Zionist troll and attacking those who believe the ritual murders as "blood libels." This article is on par for the course for the searchers of "anti-Semitism."

Indeed.I started laughing when I saw the author is Jeanette Pryor. They both work closely with Peadar Laighleis, president of the Latin Mass Society of Ireland. Among other things, Laighleis wrote an article lamenting the decline of 'Little Jerusalem' in Dublin. Laighleis recently became editor of the 'Brandsma Review'

Capt McQuigg · « **Reply #21 on:** January 15, 2013, 01:12:53 PM »

I read the article and I declare it "pablum" and not particularly noteworthy.

Does a Jєω reject Christ? If the answer is yes than he is not with you and what did Our Lord say about someone who wasn't with you?

1st Mansion Tenant · « **Reply #22 on:** January 15, 2013, 04:38:07 PM »

Why do I get a thumbs down for posting a link to the article? I thought you all might like to read and discuss it. Why shoot the messenger? Sheesh.

Incredulous · « **Reply #23 on:** January 15, 2013, 05:23:02 PM »

Quote from: MauricePinay

The author's husband, Christopher J. Pryor at work with the rabbis of Zion at the 2010 Journal for Antisemitism (JSA) Conference:

Mr Pryor says: "This is how you know that they're not really Catholic first but they're antisemitic politicians first is that they're willing to cooperate publicly with organizations with different religions ... who make very anti-Christians statements ..."

Am I the only one who senses a bizarre double-standard at work as Mr. Pryor sits on a panel alongside Rabbi Steven L. Jacobs, Rabbi Michael Berenbaum and Rabbi Richard L Rubenstein (at a conference where Daniel Goldhagen also spoke) declaring that you can know someone really isn't Catholic if they "cooperate publicly with organizations with different religions who make very anti-Christians statements"? I can barely imagine a more anti-Christian kahal than this.

You better believe brother.

Mr. Mo...reese done have the best bloodhound nose for the tribe than anyone else on this forum.

He be a valuable asset to our trad community. No jokin.

PAT317 · « **Reply #24 on:** January 15, 2013, 06:47:09 PM »

Quote from: John Grace

Quote from: Quo Vadis Petre
Oops. I mistakenly made my previous post before looking at the article and its author. Jeanette Pryor, the wife of the infamous J. Christopher Pryor, ...

Indeed.I started laughing when I saw the author is Jeanette Pryor. ...

Yes; on another link it says:

"Part IV of PJ Lifestyle's ongoing series Cults: The Mind Enslaved by ex cult-member Jeanette Pryor."

http://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2012/10/25/the-cult-that-plans-to-kill-you/

1st Mansion Tenant · « **Reply #25 on:** January 15, 2013, 07:32:25 PM »

If you go to the remarks section beneath the article, remark #7, I believe, is by someone whose name many of you will recognize.

http://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2013/01/13/the-society-of-st-pius-x-and-antisemitism/#comment-314075

Quo Vadis Petre · « **Reply #26 on:** January 15, 2013, 08:11:08 PM »

The financial Zionist guru of the SSPX makes his comments that the SSPX isn't anti-Semitic, only the "breakways" and +Williamson. What a surprise! Not! :rolleyes:

Telesphorus · « **Reply #27 on:** January 15, 2013, 08:13:46 PM »

Quote from: Quo Vadis Petre

The financial Zionist guru of the SSPX makes his comments that the SSPX isn't anti-Semitic, only the "breakways" and +Williamson. What a surprise! Not! :rolleyes:

So does he admit Jєωs are enemies of the Church?

Or does he just like to hang out with the Church's enemies?

Or was Bishop Fellay just pandering, is that what he's saying?

Telesphorus · « **Reply #28 on:** January 15, 2013, 08:24:26 PM »

Quote

the political gap between Christian and Jєωιѕн politics has closed.

You mean Jєωs are willing to accept the Social Reign of Christ the King?

Is abortion not a political issue?

Why is it that Jєωs are the strongest supporters of abortion?

Quote

I agree that there are some people within the SSPX who are not aware of this political change yet.

We're not aware of Nostra Aetate and Dignitatis Humanae? We're not aware that the "official Church" has capitulated on these issues?

Quote

But it is simply wrong to blame the largest group of traditional Catholicism of anti-Semitism.

Is it wrong to blame Jєωs for trying to force Catholics to accept Vatican II? Is it antisemitic to do so?

Quote

You can´t reduce a movement like the SSPX of the political views of some of its followers. To blame Bishop Fellay is completely nonsense and a grave unjust.

So are Jєωs enemies of the Church or not?

Quote

He gave a two-hours-speech, spoke free, he isn´t an English native speaker,

He didn't know the meaning of saying Jєωs are enemies of the Church?

Quote

and he talked about the external groups that influenced Vatican II in the early 1960s.

He was talking about Jєωs today opposing a deal. Some Jєωs don't want a deal, but you want to convince them otherwise, don't you?

Quote

In the past, he has so often taken a clear stand against anti-Semitism, that his good reputation is unquestionable –

You mean all those years he was Superior General and never spoke out against Bishop Williamson's comments, until it was world news?

Quote

and unquestioned by all who are fair and don´t try to fight the SSPX. Only Catholic newspapers have attacked him, not because of their serious concerns on anti-Semitism, but for inner-Church reasons.

Hasn't the ADL, which you defend, called him an unrepentant antisemite?

Quote

I don´t know any serious journalist who misunderstood his words in the sense you suggest here.

Jєωs are against Traditional Catholicism - they are enemies, yet we have this person constantly hanging around with Jєωs in an influential position - with connections to anti-Christian press and actually testifying for the SSPX regarding one of its former members who was in trouble with the Jєωιѕн power, and even picking his lawyer from the ranks of leftists!

It is insanity.