Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Are Sedevacantists Clueless About St. Bellarmine's True Position?  (Read 20566 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Are Sedevacantists Clueless About St. Bellarmine's True Position?
« Reply #1 on: April 22, 2018, 05:45:46 PM »
Apart from the fact that Sisco and Salsa have been completely discredited, I personally have an opinion that's in between the two major schools of thought and follows most closely that held by John of St. Thomas.  Father Chazal went that way also, and I consider his position, and that of Father Ringrose, to be the most reasonable and the most Catholic of them all.


Re: Are Sedevacantists Clueless About St. Bellarmine's True Position?
« Reply #2 on: April 22, 2018, 05:48:57 PM »
Apart from the fact that Sisco and Salsa have been completely discredited, I personally have an opinion that's in between the two major schools of thought and follows most closely that held by John of St. Thomas.  Father Chazal went that way also, and I consider his position, and that of Father Ringrose, to be the most reasonable and the most Catholic of them all.

Ladislaus-

1) Maligning authors without being able to refute their arguments only constitutes "discrediting" in the sedevacantist orb;

2) Your continued pretending that Fr. Chazal endorses your position is hilarious in light of his repeated explicit denials of same (but which clearly shows your own personal dishonesty);

Re: Are Sedevacantists Clueless About St. Bellarmine's True Position?
« Reply #3 on: April 22, 2018, 06:01:55 PM »
Notice Ladislaus is avoiding this thread, so that he does not have to address any of the content of the author he maligns (but is not capable of refuting)?

Re: Are Sedevacantists Clueless About St. Bellarmine's True Position?
« Reply #4 on: April 22, 2018, 06:11:24 PM »
Yes, Ladislaus pretends ABL was open to sedevacantism because he admitted the CHURCH might someday decide.

Note he pretends therefore that anyone of their own volition, here and now, may do the same.

Delusional.

PS: He also pretends Fr. Chazal endorses sedevacantism (sedeprivationism), despite Fr. chazal's repeated denials of same.  How does an honest man do that?