CathInfo.com

It is all very interesting that Bp. Vigano, Marshall Taylor, Bp. Schneider, Michael Voris and even Donald Trump are converting to Traditional Catholicism  


Like St. Paul, may their sincere “pilgrimages of grace” continue.

But for we, the beleaguered & betrayed Trad remnant, more specific statements are needed to trust these media converts.

They must publicly state WHO has hijacked the Holy Roman Catholic Church and specifically WHO is running the visible Church now?

And the clear answers to these questions are: ʝʊdɛօ-masonry and Opus judei.

Until these clerics and pundits speak these words WE, will never trust them.

In fact, “We resistance” trust Pax Vobis & Meg far more, for their prudent suspicions of these men.

When I hear BW or the Resistance clergy raise these (stupid) suspicions, I might tap the brakes.

To be fair, +Vigano has mentioned Masonry multiple times, and that is good.  I definitely think he sees problems in the Church.  I'm just questioning if he sees ALL the problems and if he understands HOW FAR BACK these issues go (i.e. 1800s).  And if he doesn't have the whole picture, then it's only logical to question his "solutions", which to date, have been good generally, but specifically lacking.  I'm not blaming him, for it's not his job to solve everything.  
.
In my opinion, the solution to the crisis is 1) wait for God to give us a holy pope, 2) while waiting, keep doing what we're doing, Trad wise.  Mass, sacraments, rosaries.  That's all Tradition can do.  Keep the Faith alive.  
.
Vigano's overtures to the sspx raise alarm bells.  Not because the sspx shouldn't be praised for their hard work, but because there's no reason to single them out.  There's no reason for the sspx to change anything - they should just keep working for the Faith (but I'm afraid the barn door is already open on this issue).  And because we all know the sspx is hell-bent on re-joining new-rome, then Vigano's remarks are problematic.  For he is basically arguing that 1) He's a cleric in "communion with" new rome, 2) He only says the TLM, 3) he recognizes that V2 is totally wrong and he says that 4) liturgical abuses should be avoided.  
.
This thinking logically leads to the conclusion, "If +Vigano can be a Trad in "communion with" new-rome, and totally reject V2, and ignore the bad liturgy, why can't we?"  This is the danger.