Just posted over at the Facebook page of the Regina Martyrum House, Broadstairs, Kent, U.K. where Bishop Williamson stays.

I’d try to translate except that I can’t read the handwriting to make out the characters.

I wouldn't be at all surprised to learn that +Vigano and +W are in communication. They are on the same page in many respects, which is a good thing. 

I'm not surprised to hear that. +Vigano seems pretty hard core. I've heard of many so-called "good guys" in the Novus Ordo over the years -- bishops that "conservative" Catholics get all excited about.

But I've never heard any of them sound like a Bp. Williamson sermon...

With +Vigano, I have to wonder if he's going to join the Traditional movement. He is that awake and aware.

Viganò starts with his Coat of arms motto (I know whom I have believed). From the words I manage to decipher, it seems to me, that maybe Viganò is hoping that, given his series of interventions, he may merit Holy Mass being said for him by Williamson.

This is what I was able to decipher-

I hope this daily priestly collection of my "intervention covers" is agreeable (or deserving)
Remember me in the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.

I can't say for sure, but I think it's close.

Is this a compilation book of Archbishop Vigano's letters?

As far as I'm concerned, he already did (several months ago).

I can't imagine what else would be left for him to do.

Make a final break with the Conciliar Church, and start saying Mass at one of Bp. Zendejas' chapels?
(I'm half joking here)

But other than that, he hasn't minced words and he sounds Trad rather than just conservative. He might as well "name the J**" if he hasn't already.

Make a final break with the Conciliar Church, and start saying Mass at one of Bp. Zendejas' chapels?
(I'm half joking here)

But other than that, he hasn't minced words and he sounds Trad rather than just conservative. He might as well "name the J**" if he hasn't already.

What does a "final break" look like?

He rejected the conciliar church (calling it a counterfeit church) a year ago already; he calls for the abolition of the new Mass and the entire Second Vatican Council; he says the principles of the NOM are already evident in the Pius XII revised Holy Week rites.

Now he's referencing the "тαℓмυdic origins" of the CÖVÌD scandal.

The only differences I can see between himself and +Lefebvre (or +Williamson) is that he has not yet been "excommunicated" by a pope whome he refers to simply as "the one sitting in Rome."

True, he has not founded a religoius congregation or gone on Mass circuits for the Resistance, but I suspect he has a wider audience in mind (which is awesome, since he has not watered down his rhetoric/doctrine when speaking to them!).

Nevertheless, how does one in hiding take practical steps of that sort?

Some say he needs to come out of hiding, but I wonder if him getting knocked off all the sooner because of that helps, or hurts, souls (i.e., who would soon be bereft of his voice, which is so needed today)?

Others can and do disagree, but for my part, so long as he continues to do what he has been doing (i.e., teaching truth and contradicting error!), it suffices for me.