Beneath all this pompous blather, one detects the following: "Cool people understand that the SSPX position, expressed by Father Peter Scott, is self-evidently wrong, and your accepting it demonstrates that you are a jerk, claudel." Unfortunately, you probably would have misspelled jerk, too.

For once in your life, do something useful and appropriate: namely, explain the basis on which you declare the position of the SSPX and Father Scott wrong and show precisely how the rationale that underlies the "valid but not licit" position offends Faith, reason, or both.

"Turbitude"? Really?

Certainly the loving Mother is spotless in the Sacraments by which she gives birth to and nourishes her children; in the faith which she has always preserved inviolate; in her sacred laws imposed on all; in the evangelical counsels which she recommends; in those heavenly gifts and extraordinary grace through which with inexhaustible fecundity,[130] she generates hosts of martyrs, virgins and confessors.

I know of multiple Trad families, all of whom have 12+ children, who were Trad-raised from the 70s, who have access to various priests (Independent, SSPX and Sede chapels)...but who have recently gone indult.  
.
I don't understand the confusion among these people, but the more stories you hear, this is not an isolated incident.  So many people are losing their minds (and maybe their souls).