Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Archbishop raises questions on Validity of The N.O. 1969 rite  (Read 508 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline cosmas

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 486
  • Reputation: +277/-141
  • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Unpublished: Archbishop Lefebvre raises the question of the validity of the 1969 rite
    Publication of July 10, 2007
    Marcel LefebvreAn unpublished text by Archbishop Lefebvre on Mass and a study by Bishop Guérard des Lauriers. These words alone by Archbishop Lefebvre suffice to condemn the Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificuм, which aims to make the 1969 Novus Ordo Missae accept in principle and in fact at the same time the FSSPX . "The extension and depth of the change brought to the Roman Rite of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and its similarity with the modifications made by Luther oblige Catholics faithful to their faith to ask the question of the validity of this new rite. Who better than the Reverend Father Guérard des Laurierscan make an informed contribution to the solution of this problem, which however still remains under study? " Archbishop Lefebvre " It must be asserted simpliciter that the name is invalid " Mgr Guérard des Lauriers , 1977

    [1] 'Reflections on the Novus Ordo Missae' - The validity of the new Mass in question - Mgr Guérard des Lauriers - Preface by Archbishop Lefebvre - Open the study of Bishop Guérard des Lauriers - Download the study of Bishop Guérard des Lauriers in PDFPDF
    Open the message.
    Download the message in PDF PDF


    Offline Kolar

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 81
    • Reputation: +52/-22
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Archbishop raises questions on Validity of The N.O. 1969 rite
    « Reply #1 on: May 27, 2019, 04:23:18 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Therefore the new Mass is doubtful. Presumably this means if said in the manner that Bishop Fellay thought the Archbishop would have accepted it.